peoples march

from the people against injustice in the society

Naxals hold ‘Jan Adalat’ in Bihar

Posted by ajadhind on February 28, 2009

Just 145 kms from Bihar’s capital Patna,armed naxals from the People’s War Group are regularly holding a people’s court to dispense justice.

TIMES NOW travelled to Bihar and found about fifty armed naxals from the People’s War Group, holding a Jan Adalat (people’s court) in Banke Bazar of Gaya district. The naxals held this court to convey to the villagers about their fight against the atrocities of the police and the rich capitalists.

More shockingly, the Jan Adalat was being held in the presence of the heads of five village panchayats, who hailed the ‘effort’ for the naxals, raising pro-naxal slogans ‘lal salam, lal salam’.

Around 2000 villagers participated in the Jan Adalad. Visibly pleased by the ‘justice’ dispensed by the naxals, the villagers say that the naxals are a big help to them as the state government is crushing their rights.

”The capitalist and feudal landlords have suppressed us. And now these naxals have shown us the way to progress and development.” said Sukhdev Prasad, a villager from Banke Bazar.

Another villager from Warheta, Ramanuj Rai said, “We don’t get our right that is why we have come here. These naxals are showing us the way to fight for our rights. The Maoist and naxals have found the way to redress our problems. The government hasn’t helped us much as the Maoists. If the Maoists weren’t here we wouldn’t be respected by the rich and the capitalists”

The naxals, on there part, have taken their fight for justice to a new level. They are telling the villagers that that 90 % of the poor people were the victims of the police atrocities.

A naxal leader said the gathering, “More than 90% of people face police attrocities. They frame false charges against people – accusing them of being terrorists and criminals. The common man keeps fighting for their rights, while the capitalist and the rich keep suppressing us. But no matter how much we will continue our fight.”

The naxals also called for a boycott of the Lok Sabha polls and even paid tribute to around 14,000 naxals who were killed in parts of Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Uttaranchal, Nepal and Bihar.

Ironically, the police are not even aware of this Jan Adalat that was held in broad daylight. Twenty-two out of Bihar’s 38 districts are facing the naxal menace. Despite the spate of brutal Naxal attacks in recent time, no one seems to have learnt the lesson yet – neither the cops nor the authorities.

By Prakash Singh, Patna

source

Advertisements

3 Responses to “Naxals hold ‘Jan Adalat’ in Bihar”

  1. Harsh Thakor said

    In Commemoration of 25th Martyrdom Anniversary of Comrade Krishan Singh,Secretary of the Mazdoor Kisan Sangrami Samiti. who was assasinated on 17th June 1984.The first martyr of the revolutionary peasant movement was comrade Krishna Singh in 1984.This beloved comrade came from the ranks of the poor peasantry. He failed to complete his school education and took up a job as a casual labourer in Calcutta in a jute mill.On returning to Bihar he worked as a bus conductor in the State transport co-operation. At the call of Naxalbari he became actively involved in the peasant struggle in Aurangabad.He also organised the workers of Japla Cement factory when he was arrested. On being released he began to organise the peasantry and became the secretary of the M.K.S.S on June 17th 1984 while conducting a meeting at Jharha in Palamau district he was attacked by a landlord. At first the peasants stood up but the landlord re-appeared with a bunch of goondas and forced the peasants to flee.Showing great tenacity Krishna Singh continued to speak but tragically was gunned down. This comrade was a flower that bloomed as later several peasant activists were to lay down their lives for the cause of emancipation. The commemoration meeting held for this comrade was one of the most emotional ever seen in Bihar C.P.I.(M.L) Unity Organisation and Movement of the Mazdoor Kisan Sangram Samiti Introduction .In 1977 cadres were released from jail in Jehenabad district-a historic venue of the revoluti nary peasant movement in Bihar. Cadres of the CPI (ML) from Jehanabad-Palamau region fought against the disruptionist and revisionist line put forward by Satyanarayan Singh in 1971. Also while struggling against the left line of the Bhojpur comrades, they built some roots in the area. After the release of many comrades from jail in 1977, the movement picked up momentum and was re-organised. In the self �critical review the organization resolved to build mass movements and mass organizations and launched an ideological self �rectification campaign. They organised themselves into the CPI (ML) (Unity Organisation) in 1978.These cadres had come from the Satya Narayan Singh Ranks and opposed his analysis. In 1982 the Unity Organisation merged with a section of the COC, CPI (ML) to form the COC, CPI (ML) Party Unity.(It is the 25th anniversary year in 2007)Later he same organization merged with the C.P.IML.)Peoples War Group which in term merged with the Maoist Communist Centre to form he C.P.I.(Maoist).The most prominent role in the ormaton of theOrganisati was alyed by Comrade Parimal Sen,a crusader in he struggle for revolutionary liberation.It is just one yaer since he died so ghis compilation is a tribute to this valiant Comradfe.He first struggled in prison in the emergency days and after coming out laid the foundations for theoretical and practical struffles.He sowed the seeds of the UltimateParty Unity Group. . The Jehanabad-Palamau region is one of the backward regions of Bihar. In addition to cultivation, the peasants have to rely on the collection of forest produce for their subsistence. In this area the writ of the landlord lay unchallenged. The situation began to change with the entry of the Unity Organisation. Learning from their previous �left� errors special attention was paid to build a mass base for the activities of their armed squads. A peasant organisation was formed – The Mazdoor Kisan Sangram Samiti (MKSS). All old practices were questioned and landlords� authority challenged. Struggles for wage increase, against the social oppression of women and scheduled castes, and the biggest struggles arose over the auction of forest produce.. At the Party Congress held in 1987 the COC, CPI (ML) Party Unity outlined the following tasks : “We are tackling the steadily increasing armed onslaughts of the state, through mass resistance. But gradually the squads too will have to come forward to participate in this resistance. At the phase of confiscating all lands of the landlords and on the eve of building up the guerilla zone, the activities of the squads will be the main aspect of the people�s resistance against the armed attacks of the state.” In Bihar a huge peasant movement was the C.P.I.M.L Party Unity Group(Later merged into Peoples War group which finally merged into C.P.I.Maoist) through the Mazdoor Kisan Sangrami Samiti)A major movement was led in the Jehenabad and Palamau districts.Various forms of Struggle were adopted.. Credit must be given particularly to the M.K.S. where they led broad based peseant movements.). The C.P.I.M.L Party Unity(Now merged into C.P.I.Maoist ,earlier merged into C.P.I.M.L Peoples War) ,in my opinion played he biggest role in the mass movement. The 4 mass organisations of the group formed were the Bharat Naujavan Sabha which carried out youth struggles of historic Significance (It was a major achievement that open mass revolutionary agitations for democratic rights,against corruption,in solidarity with peasant struggles,against malpractices in jails and hospitals, were led);the Mazdooor Kisan Sangram Samiti, which developed a historic peasant revolutionary movement;the NariMukti Sanghrash Samiti, (Revolutionary Women�s Front) which built a big womens revolutionary Cultural Organisation;and the Mazdoor Kisan Sangrami Parishad.(Ressurected form of the banned M.K.S.S.) Below I am submitting my compiled notes from a revolutionary Journal �Mukti Marg� and from reports of the P.U.D.R.The author recommends that earlier issues o the journal be obtained.The journal brilliantly reports he struggles of Bihar which portray the mass line-similar to the struggles before and when armed struggle was launched in China(Up to the early 1990�s)Later due to incorrect understanding of military line the mass movement suffered.The reports of peasant struggles are outstanding I the journal ,particulary those in Palamau and Jehenabad.I also recommend readse to raed he reports of he A.P.D.R in Wst Bengal whose excerpts are published in the E.P.W.). Peasant Movement and Poltical Struggles . The Jehanabad-Palamau region is one of the backward regions of Bihar. In addition to cultivation, the peasants have to rely on the collection of forest produce for their subsistence. In this area the writ of the landlord lay unchallenged. The situation began to change with the entry of the Unity Organisation. Learning from their previous �left� errors special attention was paid to build a mass base for the activities of their armed squads. A peasant organisation was formed – The Mazdoor Kisan Sangram Samiti (MKSS). All old practices were questioned and landlords� authority challenged. Struggles for wage increase, against the social oppression of women and scheduled castes, and the biggest struggles arose over the auction of forest produce.The incipient movement saw three of its young activists martyred on 10th August 1982. The landlords of Bhagwanpur village in Gaya district kidnaped Lakhan Manjhi (20 years), Sudeshi Manjhi (19) and Balkishore Manjhi (15) and killed them. Lakhan was an important member of the Party�s Red Squad. In May 1984 the Palamau-Aurangabad Regional Committee of the MKSS had held its conference and plans were being made for fresh attacks on the landlords . In June 1984 the movement faced a severe loss, when the popular secretary of the MKSS, Krishna Singh, was shot dead by landlords. In May 1984 the Palamau-Aurangabad Regional Committee of the MKSS had held its conference and plans were being made for fresh attacks on the landlords. The story of his life resmbled that of a mountaineer attempting to conquer the steepest of mountaisn, bearing every hazard. On June 17, Krishna Singh was conducting a meeting of the MKSS at Jharna in Palamau district. The local landlord and goondas attacked the meeting, opening fire. A chase began, Com. Krishna Singh allowed his comrades to get away, and fell to the enemy�s bullets. Condemnation of this murder spread in a spate of protests throughout the area. The protests led to the arrest of 35 of the hoodlums involved.Meanwhile. As the movement grew the party too put forward the perspective of building up a guerilla zone. In 1986 ,the Bihar State banned the Mazdoor Kisan Sangram Samiti, led by the Party Unity Group.This organisation had organised a strong revolutionary peasant movement ,particularly in areas of Central Bihar. The major areas were Jehanabad and Palamau districts..In 1986 a major massacre took place in Arwal in Jehanabad district. The leaders of the Mazdoor Kisan Sangrami Samiti were arrested,including it’s general secretary.Office bearers Arvind Kumar,Vijaykumar and Jeetram Singh were arrested.On March 24th,1986 the policearrested Jagdeo Sharma,an activist of he M.K S S.In retaliatn the peasants converged on the streets crying�Release Jagdeo Sharma.Hundreds of peasants surrounded he police van and pulled Comrade Sharma out of the grip of the police.In this heroic act of defiance Comrdae Siddhi Ram fell as amartyr.History repeated itself in Village Bhawardah of Panki Block in 1988(20th anniversary year of resistance) when a police party was engulfed by hundreds of women opposing the police raids o villages. Various struggles for partial demands and against landlord repression were led by the peasant organisation.A typical example was in Garwah district. Here the area was dominated by Rajput landlords and the people were subjected to barbaric opression.When they struggled they were trampled upon by the landlord’s Sunllight Sena who killed 4 people including a brother and 3 minor children. The people retaliated but only for the Sunlight Sena again attacking them and burning down Karui village displacing 200 families.After a long protracted struggle led by the peasant organization 6 of the Rajput landlords surrendered before the people.Under the leadership of the Parishad the displaced people captured some gair Marzua land near Karui village and a new village was called named after Shaheed Kunal .The landlord leaders got in touch with the reactionary leaders and attacked Shaheed Kunal Nagar in large numbers.,kidnapping 7 people and killing 7 people. Statewide protest took place all over the State. Another Struggle took place in 1992 in Akbarpur village.The Samiti had entered the area in 1987 taking up the issue of a dalit Tola being razed to the ground. After 2 Bhumihar landlords had been annihilated. The M.K.S.S helped the Dalit families rebuild their houses. Later the struggle for wages was also taken up. Only after a protracted struggle did the peasants win the struggle for minimum wages. In 1992 the struggle for land began. Crop Seizure programmes were taken up and peasants were organised not to work in the houses and fields of the reactionary families. A strong economic blockade was launched. The landlords attempted to bring their ploughs and bullocks in large numbers but their attempts were thwarted by the people. The village people seized the ploughs and bullocks. In 1993 the peasant organisation led a heroic struggle in the Palamau-Garwah region. On 25th May 1993 the peasants burnt the palatial house of Budhinarayan Sah’s,a notorious landlord who owned 1700 acres of land and who used to tie rebellious peasants to huge anthills of red ants. For over 4 years the people in the area had waged a struggle ransacking his house and seizing arms. 7,000 acres of land which he had criminally seized was re-captured by the peasants and the notorious class enemy was forced to flee the village. This was remarkale as the Mazdur Kisan Sangrami SAmiti was banned organization and now functioning in a ressurected form. Similarly land struggles took place in other districts of Bihar like Jehanabad,Gaya, Patna,Khagaria,Begusurai,Buxar ,Rohtas,Bhabhua and Aurangabad districts.Struggles were also carried for people’s authority.People’s courts were set up to punish guilty offenders.In Palamau 400 women set up a Jan Panchayat trying a criminal by the name of Tetar Baiga guilty of raping several women.He was sentenced to death and beaten up in public.Similarly, a landlord Jay Narayan Singh of Pariyari village in Karpi block was meted out punishment in Jehanabad district who had illegally seized land.In Rohtas district too significat struggles were held.Meetings were held mobilising 100’s of peasants. A meeting of particular significance was held on 7th January. On 8th December 3 peasants had killed a criminal landlord element. The police used this as a pretext to repress the masses and went around villages exposing the peasants and trumping up criminal charges against them. They razed 35 houses to the ground and extorted money from the people. The fact that that elements had illegally grabbed gairmajura land was hidden.The Jan Sangram Samiti in Rohtas held a meeting exposing this. A massive protest programme was heldagainst this injustice. In 1991 in Parasona,in Jehanabad,,22 acres of gair mazarualand controlled by a single landowner from Shaguni was captured under the leadership of the Mazdoor Kisan Mukti Manch(resurrected form of the Mazdoor Kisan Sangrami Samiti) and paddy as sown.At the time of the harvest the landlord�s henchman attacked the village fired at the villagers and harvested the crop.The villagers boycotted the land for 2 years ,at the end of which the land was sold to Sudhir Kumar ,a middle-peasant owner Lodhipur. The Mazdoor Kisan Mukti Manch also captured 1000 acres of land created by the shifting of the river bed of Son in Jalpura Vilage in Patna.The M.K.M.M,in addition to struggles for fair wages ,took up issues directly connected to the development of agriculture.It formed a struggle committee that took up the task of building the 9km dam across the Tenar in Arwal block.Community labour from the surrounding villages was organized.. Struggles against Communalsim(opposing thedestroying of the Babri Masjid)-Copiled from Mukti Marg May-June1993 issue After the destruction of the Babri Masjid on December 6th 1992 by the Kar Sevaks the Bharat Naujavan Sabha launched a massive anti-communal campaign all through the State.In Daltonganj The youth front launched a cycle rally in protest.Bajrang Dal goondas tried to intimidate the activists but the youth carried out heroic self-defence and drove away the reactionaries.In Jehanabad the Mazdoor Kisan Mukti Manch carried out an anti -communal cycle rally covering a distance of 125 Km.covering more than 15 blocks from 1st February to 15th February..In Gaya the Bharat Naujavan Sabha launched cultural programmes against the communal holocaust.A similar programme took place carried out by the Bharat Naujavan Sabha and other progressive organisations in Bokaro.These programmes were significant in regard to the revolutionary democratic struggle against Communalism. Struggles for Trade Union Rights . A memorandum was presented to the Bihar govt..On the trade Union Front, the Bihar Mines democratic Workers Union on 18th May staged a public meeting, in which Japla Cement factory workers and neighbouring mine workers participated. A demand was placed asking for the re-starting of the closed Japla Factory and the Balliya quarry.Electricity,water,cleanliness,was also demanded.The Japla Cement factory as closed and thousands of workers who had made immense sacrifices lost their jobs. From 29 th September 1985 to 14th August 1990 it was closed.4000 workers died out of hunger.Workers made sacrifices of great proportions to have kept the factory running, denying themselves the govt.compensation of RS.13 crore. Later all over Jehanabad,there was a mass campaign condemning the murder. Programs commemorating martyrs-Compiled from Mukti Marg May-June 1993 and Mukti Marg 1992 Other frequent types of political programmes were commemoration meetings launched in memory of Martyrs in the revolutionary peasant movement. The most significant of these was the commemoration meeting of Comrade Krishna Singh who died in 1984.(report obtained fro Mukti Marg May-June 1993) This programme was conducted in his native village Badem in Jehanabad on 12th June.A huge rally comprising of 10,000 people took place. People came from 12 districts. Slogans were raised in memory of the beloved comrade and a flag was hoisted in his honour. This programme was presided by Dadachi Ray,the State Lok Sangram Morcha convenor. As well as his father Rajdev Singh.Earlier a public meeting was held adressed by Satish of Bharat Naujavan Sangh as well as Ranjit and Navlesh, Janmukti Parishad’s Rajdev Ram, Sachidanand Prabhat,office -bearer of the Jehanabad Gaya section of the Mazdoor Kisan Mukti Manch,Gupteshwar Singh and Arjun Prasad Singh of the Lok Sangram Morcha. And Kiran of the Nari Mukti Sangharsh Samiti.In Jehanabad jail too a commemoration meeting was held. Other significant martyrdom programmes were those commemorating martyrs Pankaj, Manju and Aditya . A rally was held in Palamau attended by 4,000 people on 22nd March 1992. It was conducted by Bharat Naujavan Sabha and Nari Mukti Sangharsh Samiti.This programme was adressed by Satish ,Chanchal and Sanju of Bharat Naujavan Sabha,Sachidanand Prabhat of the M.K.K.M.and Kiran of the Nari Mukti Sangharsh Samiti.The rally was lathi-charged by the police and a protest meeting was launched in Daltangaunj on 2nd April by Bharat Naujavan Sabha.On 22nd March protestors stopped the Palamau express. After this commemoration programmes were also held commemorating comrades Jagdish Paswan who was killed by activists of the Liberation group.Similarly programmes were held for comrades Rajdev Das and Mukhiya (Also killed by Liberation activists),martyrs in the peasant movement.(report from Mukti Marg July-Augus1992) In July 1993 Comrade Suresh Thakur was martyred at the hands of the Liberation Group.They went to his house and murdered him.On 11th March his martyrdom was commemorated in Bhojpur in Baruhi village.Dadichay Ray ,Sachidanand Prabhat and Amitabh.(Bharat Naujavan Sabha)adressed the gathering. On the day of heArwal massacre in commemoration in April 1993 a meeting was held by the Mazdur Kisan Mukti ManchAshok Sing addressed the gathering as well as Lok Sangram Morcha leader ,Sacidanad Prabhat:Kiran,activist of Nari Mukti Sangharsh Samiti:Bihar democratic mine workers Union activist Bhuvaneshwar Singh, attended by about 600 people . Other commemorative meetings were held for Comrades Jagdish Pasawn I Sidhpur (activist of M.K S S,martyred at the hands of Liberation goons),Comrdae Mukhiya in I Khirimud,.A meeting was held in memory of Comrades Pankaj,Manju and Aditya on 22nd March in 1993 in Daltonganj It had ahuge response A huge rally was held.(The previous yaer it had been commemorated by Jan Mukti Parishad)4000 people participated. Partial Struggles-Compiled from Mukti MargJul-Aug. 1992 issue In 1992 a major programme was launched by he Mazdur Kisan Mukti Manch on 30thMayin Gaya on he issue of building a pipeline.Ruling class partiesneglected all the demands of the peole likeLanad and watr.The Taylor Sangharsh Samiti was inspired by the M.K.M.M.One of the biggest ever rallies was launched with of red Flags raised in the air..People were organized with digging instruments.Lok Sangram Morcha played a major role under the leadership of Arjun Prasda Singh..Participating Organisations were the Mazdur Kisan Mukti Manch ,the Lok Sangra Morcha . The besieged policemen attempted to fire ,but were thwarted by he militant women. They snatched the us from the police and beat them up severely. In 1988 a front comprising of 7 revolutionary organisations was formed called the Lok Sangram Morcha which had it’s innaugural convention in 1988 in Rohtas district.In1989 it alsoorganised a massive convention against repression in Bihar.In 1989 the peasant organisation was ressurected in the name ok Mazdoor Kisan Mukti Manch.Earlier in 1988 the Bharat Naujavan Sabha had been formed to build a strong revolutionary youth movement.In 1990 a huge rallyw as joitly held bythe Lok Sangram Morcah aand the Jan Suraksha Manch(maSs front of M.C.C) From 17th March 1999 an event of tremendous political significance took place all over Bihar. This was the state-wide anti-repression campaign by the All -India People’s Resistance Forum. This organisation did wall -writing and postering all through the State. The Jharkhand areas like Ranchi,Palamau were covered well as Jehanabad, Buxar.Gaya, Bhagalpur and Banka districts. In Ranchi 200 people participated including a large number of intellectuals, journalists and activists associated with the Jharkhand movement. However in Daltonganj,another Jharkhand district 200 people attended but the response from intellectuals were poor. In Gaya 150 people attended while in Jehanabad the programme was banned. In Buxar 250 people assembled. In Khagaria 300 people attended and finally in Banka 100 people participared.. All the Speakers unequivocally condemned the nation-wide State Repression, highlighting the patronage given to the Ranbir Sena by the State in Bihar. Similarly the State Repression in Andhra Pradesh and Dandkaranya was condemned and the people were called upon to unitedly resist State Repression.This was the first time the All India People’s Resistance Forum carried out such a State-wide programme in Bihar covering the areas of Jharkhand ,North and Central Bihar.It had a positive influence on the people as never before in Bihar was such a State-wide campaign carried out against State Repression.The political Significance was that light was thrown on Repression in India as a whole.(From Peoles REsistane-oragn of A.I.P.R.F.) In December 1999 a huge protest was organised in Patna protesting against the encounter killing of 3 Central committee members of the People’s War Group in Andhra Pradesh..Another protest was held where all types of Revolutionary Democratic sections participated including the Democratic Lawyers asscosiation,. Here similar to the Laxmanpur-Bathe Revolutionary and democratic agitations Reference to journals like Mukti Marg.Peoples esistance EtcI n 1991 the Lok Sangram Morcha led a massive rally in Palamau district consisting of 10,000 people protesting against ‘Operation Agnidoot.’Arjun Singh,convenor of the Lok Sangram Morcha and Bharat Naujavan Sabha, Palamau convener Satish Kumar addressed the rally. In Palamau as a result of strong repression faced by the Sunlight Sena the democratic organisations protested through a protest rally. The state police attacked the protest. Thus 7 democratic organisations made a joint front. Here a protest was also launched against the arrest of democratic jounalistAmitabh Bagchi., as the arrests of 3 activists of the Jan Mukti Parishad and the killing of 3 M.C.C activists.On 27th December in Palamau Jan Mukti Parishad held a conference protesting against Devendra Nath Sahadev who carried out severe repression on coal workers.. The meeting was held at Brahani Bazar where comrades Satish Kumar of the Bharat Naujavan Sabha,Rajdev Ram of the Jan Mukti Parishad,Gurteshwar Singh of the Workers Struggle Front,and Mithlesh Singh of the Colliery Workers Union.This meeting had a significant impact on coal workers. Similarly in Jehanabad districts rallies and conventions were organised. They exposed the opression on the peasantry by landlord gangs like the Bhoomi Sena,the Lorrik Sena and the Brahmarshi Sena.They also condemned ‘Operation Rakshak‘, where great police repression took place on people from all walks of life.On 30th November 1990 a massive peasant gathering was organised adressed by Arvind Kumar,leader of the Mazdoor Kisan Mukti Manch,and Rajesh Kumar ,state convenor of the Bharat Naujavan Sabha,Bihar,Nandlal Pandit of the Lok Sangram Morcha and Arjun Prasad Singh State convenor of the Lok Sangram Morcha. All these speakers explained the peasants the need to form a strong agrarian revolutionary peasant movement and the need for the middle peasants to unite wth the landless. Democratic resolutions were passed at the meet demanding effective dams for irrigation as well for implementation of the land ceilings Act. There was no adequate protection to the peasants during both times of drought and floods, where work had only been done to protect the vested interests of the landlords. Demands were made for the State Government implementing adequate protection schemes against both types of disasters. It was demanded that a permanent dyke should be built on the Pun pun River in Motepur,a mor-bund should be built in Pymar river at Tedar,the Jamnai river should be cleaned and widened the Gaayghat dam of Barabar Pahad should be consolidated, the Chapadhat dyke of Jamnai should be cleaned,the Sone canal be modernised,the Gairjura land be distributed to the landless and that houses should be allotted to the needy, implementing the housing schemes. After the convention for one month a Padyatra was taken all over the districts culminating in a conference on 27th and 28th January.From 2nd March to 30th March, a massive rally was held, comprising of cycle rallies in different areas.On 19th April a convention was held in Arwal commemorating the massacre in 1986. The prograamme culminated in Gaya where a massive conference of landless and poor peasants took place.(Informatio fro Mukti Marg,Jan-Feb 1991) Another significant feature of the movement at that time was the jail struggles as well as struggles for democratic Rights ,particularly in Jehanabad and Palamau districts.A struggle was held in Jehanabad jail protesting against corruption of jail atrocities led by Sachidanand Prabhat.On 16th January a massive gathering was organised by the Lok Sangram Morcha and the Bharat Naujavan Sabha.A memorandum was presented to the jail authorities. In Daltonganj,in Palamau district the Bharat Naujavan Sabha led a protest against the arrest of activist Ramkeshwar Singh of the Janmukti Parishad. About 150 youth assembled and the gathering was adressed by Satish Kumar, Bharat Naujavan Sabha convenor,Bhuvaneshwar Prasad of the Lok Sangram Morcha and Vyavsayi Singh of the Slum dwellers commiteee.Later in Palamau 3 Bharat Naujavan Sabha activists were arrested against which Lok Sangram Morcha launched a massive protest.Here a demand was also launched against the banning on revolutionary organisations in the State. Later in 1993 a massive struggle was carried out in Daltonganj jail against malpractices. Political prisoners were denied the most basic rights. There was no proper food, water ,sleeping facilities, sanitation or medical attention. The jail administration was also hand in hand with corrupt contractors and politicians. The Indian People’s Front joined hands with the Lok Sangram Morcha and Bharat Naujavan Sabha on this issue. The political prisoners launched a hunger strike against the T.A.D.A.3 Prisoners were transferred to Gaya jail namely Jagdev Sharma,Yugal Pal,Vinod Vidrohiand Jagdev Sharma.Prisoners protested this including the transferred convicts..At the end of the protest a memorandum was given by the organisations.What was healthy that such struggles spread to other areas and did not display individual terrorist tendencies.9i Andhra Pradesh mass fronts like the R.S U and RYL.displayed strong tendenciesAfter the unjust death sentence on the 13 activists from the M.C.C who participated in the Dalechauk Baghaura massacre. The Mazdoor Kisan Sangrami Parishad launched a statewide protest campaigncovering Jehanabad, Gaya,Patna, Aurangabad, Daltangaunj, Gadhwa, Begususrai, and Bokaro districts. On 25th September a massive jam was carried out in Palamau.The campaign was carried out from 19th September to 25th September. On 18th May 1992 in Shankar ganj in Jehanbad district 2 activists of the Mazdur Kisan Sangrami Samiti were killed by the Bihar police.They were shot with their hands tied behind their backs. The Mazdur Kisan Mukti Manch launched a traffic jam on Arwal-Jehanbad road. On 25th May a protest was held outside the jails. On 2nd June a conference was held. Comprising of 1500 people. It was demanded that the guilty police were punished , the families of the victims compensated Rs ,50,000 each,all police camps withdrawn, all repression on democratic organizations banned. Police camps were deployed to thwart protest. On 5th June a major rally was helped at Golambar junction in Patna.To protest against Operation Agnidoot a military offensive ruthlessly used the T.A.D.A black law. Several democratic activists were arrested. On 13th July, in Palamau,,a protest as held by the Lok Sangram Morcha,.Democratic Organizations like the Indian Peoples Front(only cadres are revolutionary),Mazdur Kisan Sangharsh Vahini,Bihar Mines democratic Workers Union participated. In Dalatngaunj,Lok Sangram Morcha,Jan Sangram Manch,and M.K.S.S protested outside a jail. On 20th June revolutionary democratic Organizations launched a massive struggle against jail malpractices in Daltangaunj. For 3 days.700 people participated. The agitation continued till 17th July. Facilities for fan,latrines,food Etc were demanded.M.C.C,Jan Mukti Parishad,Lok Sangram Morcha,.Party Unity, and Jan Suraksha Manch participated.(Taken rom Mukti Marg-Jan-Feb 1991) In 1996 The Bharat Naujavan Sabha led a massive protest against malpractices and corruption of doctors in Daltonganj town of Palamau district. In Chainpur Bazar area Bharat Naujavan Sabha led a massive 500 people demonstration against inadequate facilities in government hospitals. The doctors hardly attended work. A memorandum was presented to the city administration against this. These organisations also participated in several campaigns against state and landlord Sena’s repression.(eg.The Laxmanpur-Bathe massacre carried out by the Ranbir Sena) On 24th November 1992 to 20th January1993 a major protest was launched against drought and corruption of state government bodies in Palamau. It was launched by people from, 300 villages, that too in a single day. From 50 villages the headman attended .In the final public meeting 5000 people attended. In Garwah district. In Palamau-Garwah a massive police force was deployed to curb the protest. Jan Mukti Parishad activists were arrested from Garwah,Daltangaunj,and Japla Etc. A massive stir was built up demanding justice,implementaion of correct policies towards drought,punishment to corrupt contractors Etching various villages. On 29th January in Shankar Vigraha village in Jehanabad 22 Dalits was massacred .In Palamau a protest meeting in solidarity was lathi-charged in Ranchi-Daltangaunj.Here people from 15 villages carried out a massive jam. During the lathii charge the head of J.M.K.S.P leader Ramjit Mahato was severely injured. On 8th February the M.K.S.P held a huge meeting Shankar Vigha village protesting the massacre in protest. The Jan Abhiyan Bihar(comprising of 12 democratic organizations) ,too participated .Against the massacres of the Ranbir Sena in Laxmanpur Bathe and Shankar bigha torchlight processions and cycle rallies were carried out on protest by the Bharat Naujavan Sabha and the D.S.U.In 1997 a meeting held in Jehanabad district commemorating the Russian Revolution was disrupted by the Police under the pretext of Section 144.This event took place on November 23d.Several activists were arrested. The police refused to give permission to give a public meeting. Ultimately after a strong protest a protest meeting of about 500 people was held. This meeting was adressed by Sachidanand Prabhat of the M.K.S.P,Sandeep of the D.S.U.,Sunita of the Nari Mukti Sangharsh Samiti and Arjun Prasad Singh of the A.I.P.R.F.The meeting was presid4ed by comrade Pappu of the M.K.S.P.Earlier they tear a meeting carried out to commemorate the Arwal massacre was disrupted and office-bearers of the revolutionary organizations were arrested.Sachidand Prabhat,the Jehanabad District M.K.S.P secretary was badly tortured and arrested. The previous day the police killed Comrade Pawan Nat during a firing on a torch light procession carried out by the Bharat Naujavan Sabha.In this period Palamau district also experienced massive dreprssion. The state office of the Bharat Naujavan Sabha was raided in 1997.To commemorate May Day Lok Sangram Morcha had planned to organise a public meeting commemorating the historic event on May 9th.The police blocked entry to all parts of Daltonganj town. During the meeting the police arrested 30 people including 3 Lok Sangram Morcha State committee members. On 27th April the meeting of the Harahan Mazdoor Kisan Sangrami Parishad organised at Lohar dagga on the issue of Kendu leaves was stopped by the police. On 22nd November 1998 a martyrs meeting commemorating Comrade Devlal Pal was lathi-charged by the police in Vishrampur village.Houses of peasant leaders were raided and several activists were illegally detained. Villager’s houses were razed to the ground. On 27th January 1999 a meeting of the Jharkhandi Kisan Sangrami Parishad was attacked in Panki village in Palamau.This meeting was held against Manatu,a notorious criminal .Several activists were arrested. Earlier the Jharkhand Mazdoor Kisan Sangrami Parishad carried out a struggle against a corrupt building development officer. A mass meeting was held mobilising 1500 people. A call was given to the masses to form a people’s court against the corrupt practices of the Building development officer A prominent feature of repression was that of the Ranvir Sena which carried out 2 major massacres in Laxmanpur Bathe and Shankar bigha in Jehanabad districts in 1998 and 1999 respectively. The State had connived with the criminal gangs to suppress the revolutionary peasant movement. Massive State-wide protests were held condemning the massacres where progressive anddemocratic sections of various trends participated. With the Revolutionaryorganisations of the Party Unity and Maoist Communist center, various communist revolutionary organisations representing various trends participated like the C.P.I.M.LRed Flag ,the C.P.I.M.L New Democracy, the C.P.I M.L Janashakti etc.In these rallies organisations supporting the J.P.movement participated like the Jan Mukti Sangharsh Vahini. The state wideprotests had tremendous significance in regard to the revolutionary democratic movement.What was significant that democratic organisations held a joint protest irrespective of the political trends they represented.In 1998 a Jan Abhiyan of 14 organisations was formed against State and Landlord repression. Massacre groups of all trends participated which has tremendous significance in the revolutionary democratic movementOn 3rd January 1993,the Jan Mukti Parishad captured a dacoit and 2 thieves. In Garwah district in Ataual Village2000 people staged a people�s court. All the looted items were rcovered.This lifted the initiative of the masses to wage a war against injustice and that it was possible to collectively punish and defeat reactionary elements .9Taken from Muti Marg (March 2000) In 1999 in Jehanbad district the Nari Mukti Sangharsh Samiti and the Bharat Naujavan Sabha carried out a campaign against corruption,malpractices,. It started from Jehanabad Railway station.JaiKishore of Bharat Naujavan Sabha and Sunita of Nari Mukti Sangharsh Samiti addressed the gathering. This was significant as in since the late 1990s it was impossible to carry out a democratic meeting in the district. In Begusrai,around the same time a massive campaign was held, against notorious landlords Vijay Singh,Anil Singh. When the M.K.S .P began to work in the region, the landlords tried to sell their lands ,which they had stolen from the peasants who were now landless. They got in contact with the police and hired lumpens to attack the hose of a poor peasant Ram Mahto.The M.K S.P activists protested this mobilized the peasants in ameeting.on 11th August a public meeting was held, comprising of 150people.Raja Ram of the D.S U sang a cultural song and the speakers wee Yogendra Pandit and Ram Mahto.After the meeting all the peasants with great resolve and determination went back. To their original place. (Report from Mukti Marg �July-August 1999) In 2000 with the co-peration of A.I.P.R,F forces the Jan Abhiyan �A mass democratic Front launched a massive campaign against corruption and goonda raj. Meetings were held in B.N college,PostalPark,MahenDra region.A convention was held in Patna college seminar hall.A rally was held .Organizatio s of various trends participated. unjust condition sin prisons. In 1999,took up a major campaign on issues of rape, murder and loot mobilizing 500 people in Banka-Bhagalpur.Revolutionary politics was explained . In Vaishali a campaign was launched in November 1999,commemorating the Russian revolution and protesting against the rise in diesel prices and bus fare hikes.Arjun Prasad Singh,Chandu Prasad and Shambu Ram, of the Bhagat Singh Club presided over the programme.In Khagaria the activists organised commitees for flood relief and organised several protests to ensure effective protection to the peasantry in the time of floods.To protect the interest of the landlord classes the government took no interest in the People’s welfare.The activists helped form people’s commitees in order to enhance protection against floods. At Malgodam Station in Khagaria town a public meeting was organised on the topic of ‘Floods.’The meeting was adressed by Gautam Mukherjee of the Bharat Naujavan Sabha, Sachidanand Prabhat of the Mazdoor Kisan Sangrami Parishad,Sunita of the Nari Mukti Sangharsh committee and Sanyojak Shavi of the M.K.S.P and Anil of D.S.U.A memorandum of demands was given to the adminstration.Here it was demanded that adequate boat supply was given to protect people from this calamity and that effective dams should be built. More recent struggle led by the M.K S P in Khagaria and Bhagalpur districts defending fishing rights. In Khagaria the MK.S.P also led struggles protesting against the repression meted out by the Communist Party of India.The C.PI sided with the police in suppressing activists as well as used goondas to beat up the peasant activists. A meeting of 300 people was held. Later on similar grounds in Begusurai activists held a protest meeting consisting of 600 people .This meeting was adressed by Krishna Kant Singh. Later a small convention was held attended by 600 people explaining the nexus between the C.P.I and the State Police. In Begusurai the M.K.S.P carried out a land struggle against Retired magistrate Rajendra Singh and professor Vijay Singh who illegally seized land violating the land ceilings act.Under the leadership of the Mazdoor Kisan Sangrami Parishad the peasants re-captured 200 acres of land. A mass meeting was held in December mobilising 500 people. Later on December 9th a mass meeting was held educating people to fight for their land rights and struggle under the banner of the Red Flag. A most significant event in Bihar’s Revolutionary politics was the merging of the Janvadi Mazdoor Kisan Samiti with the M.K.S.P in 1999..In Bhagalpurand Banka districts the J.M.K.S led a strong peasant movement. After their merging a major struggle was held to protect the peasants fishing rights in Banka.The people of Ulhi had waged several struggles for these rights. The first one was when the land was grabbed by Ram Mandal.The Second one was when Mukhia had grabbed their rights of fishing. The peasants had then decided that the catch made by the contractor must be distributed to all the people.This management functioned effectively till 1994. In 1994 the “Daak Sunder Tudu” was re-named and the goonda Subhash Yadav started fishing with the help of his gang in the peasant�s property. He did not share his catch with anybody else. However from 8th to 10th February there was a strong dual between the villagers and the gang of Subhash Yadav.The hooligan used bombs and lethal weapons to scare the villagers. The police Thana sided with the criminal under the pretext of col144.Subhash Yadav re-began fishing. On the 12th February 1999,the M K S P led a successful rally explaining the masses the event that took place. The peasant organisation organised the farm labour of Belhar and other surrounding areas and put up a protracted fight against Suresh Yadav and his gangs.600 people including women and children participated driving the culprits. Although the enemy was armed with guns and ammunition .The masses seized the enemy’s weapons. The peasants had won a victory. Suresh Yadav continued his antics but as an organised force the peasants consistently retaliated and defended the right to their livelihood. The class enemies continued to attempt to disunite the people, however the M.K.S.P thwarted their bid by continuously educating the peasantry. International Issues In 1991 protests were led by Bharat Naujavan Sabha and Lok Sangram Morcha against the U.S attacks on Iraq. A rally consisting of about 100 people was held in Daltonganj.In similar numbers rallies was held in Jehanabad. .On the author�s visit in October 2001 one of the greatest protests ever staged in the movement in Bihar took place against the American Govt�s decision to declare War after the September 11th Incident.8,000 peasant activist were mobilized particularly from Bhagalpur in protest .The author also met one Comrade of the Bharat Naujavan Sabha from Daltangonj district who reported a jail struggle led by the youth front for better facilities successfully. Revolutionary peasant struggles for land. Information compiled from Peop lesResistance 1995 issue-From the report on peasant struggles by the M.K S.P by Arjun Prasad Singh.Alos published in Mukti Marg issues from 1989-1993 Developments 1994 the peasant organisation was re-named the Mazdoor Kisan Sangrami Parishad.In this year the Party Unity launched their student front the Democratic Students Union. In this year Bharat Naujavan Sabha had it’s innaugural State conference. Here Gautam Mukherjee was made the president.The conference was attended by 6,ooo people.Another event of Political ,significance during this period was the formation of the All-India People’s Resistance Forum which now functioned actively in Bihar. As the Mazdoor Kisan Sangrami Parishad a strong revolutionary peasant movement existed but the Party Unity’s frontal organisation had to resort principally to underground functioning., particularly in Jehanabad and Palamau districts. Most of the open programmes were conducted by the All India Peoples Resistance Forum, Bharat Naujavan Sabha and the DemocraticStudents Union. The Mazdoor Kisan Sangrami Parishad led a martyr�s memorial meeting on August 15th in Panky in Palamau-Garwah district commemorating the martyrdom of comrades. This meeting was presided by Rajdev Ram of the M.K.S.P.All speakers condemned repression on the peasant movement. During this period the youth and Student organisations worked amongst the peasantry through carrying out ‘Go to Village Campaigns.’.. Jharkand Issue Compiled fro Mukti Marg Sept-Oct.1997 issue The other event of enormous political Significance was the movement for a separate Jharkhand. The revolutionary forces consistently supported this movement and various functions were presided over this issue. The prominent Jharkhand areas of the movement were Ranchi, Palamau and Bokaro.In 1987 the Jharkhand co-ordination committee was formed giving a political perspective to the movement. However due to the opportunist attitude of the leadership it ceased to function after having talks with the Central Government. The State Government played a trick forming the Jharkhand Autonomous Council winning over all the stalwarts of Jharkhand like Ram Dayal Munda,Sanjay Basu Mallik and other revolutionary ideologues. In a very difficult political situation the Jharkhand Mazdoor Kisan Sangrami Parishad and the Hul Jharkhand Kranti Dal planned to intervene. A joint seminar and rally was held mobilising people from all over Jharkhand in Ranchi.Here 3000 people assembled from Ranchi, Dhabi, Singh bum, Jamshedpur, Bokaro, Gumla, Lohargada, Palamau, Garhwa, Hazaribagh and other districts. In the convention Lewa Chand Tedu,the old and reknowned fighters of the Midnapur and Jharkhand struggles,participated. The chief guest of the meeting was Comrade Darshan Pal.He spoke on the need of co-ordinating the movement of Jharkhand and other nationalities with the ongoing democratic andrevolutionary movements of the Country.He also said that the attainment of the Statehood of Jharkhand would provide no solution to the basic problems of the people of Jharkhand,so people should fight for a new Jharkhand in a new federal democratic India. Later Arjun Prasad Singh spoke on the need of raising the political consciousness of the people of Jharkhand and Shambu Mahatoof the Hul Jharkhand Kranti Dal pointed the importance of targeting imperialism. As the main enemy.He recalled the glorious history of the Jharkhand movement. The following day a seminar was held analysing the polemical aspects of the Jharkhand struggle from a Marxist -Leninist point of view.This was presided by Shambu Mahato of the H.K.K.D and Shridhar of the J.M.K.S.P.In the post 1994 period the Mazdoor Sangrami Parishad did significant work in Khagaria and Begusurai districts and Banka districts. The Emergence of revolutionary student organisations was of greatsignificance in Bihar. Revolutionary Student Movement in Bihar. Information based o reports from revolutionarystudent journal �Kalam� and activists of Democratic Students Union.The 1996,1997,1998 and 1999 issues of Kalam have been referred to In 1994 the Party Unity section formed their first ever revolutionary student organisation in Bihar which was the Democratic Students Union.(The D.S.U.)This had its roots in the Bharat Naujavan Sabha formed in 1988.TheBharat Naujavan Sabha earlier fought for the students and youth collectively. For the first time a separate organizational structure was built for students. Several former Bharat Naujavan Sabha activists took up the responsibility of building D.S.U. The strategy of the Democratic Students Union was to organise students on their partial demands as well as connect their problems to the chief political issues of the day. The student movement had to be oriented towards the interests of the agrarian revolution. For achieving the task the Democratic Students Union took up the responsibility of organizing �Go to Village Campaigns�. Democratic Students Union also planned to fight against imperialism. as well as democratic issues. In the colleges the D.S.U fought against malpractices in Arts colleges as well as engineering colleges. In these institutions unqualified teachers and principals were appointed. Funds were misappropriated by managements. In the Patna Arts College the Principal even stole paintings.D.S.U organised agitations agains this.D.S.U D.S.U declared a lockout in the college not allowing principals and teachers to enter the college.Waris Hadi was made principal in 1994 as he had political links with the governor of Bihar.He sold paintings and illegally appointed several people irrespective of merit. including a lecturer who faced a murder charge. After a protracted student struggle the principal was removed. The president of the then students union was rusticated from the university due to complete collapse of administrative structure in the college. The college was not de-affiliated from the All India technical Services board which badly affected students. The D.S.U organised agitations against indifference and politicking in Patna University.70students sat on a dharna for 5 daysand a poster exhibition was organised.Programmes were taken jointly with A.I.S.F,the S.F.I and the A.I.D.S.O. fighting for student�s admissions.Dharnas were held against malpractices and corruption. Agitations were also launched against fee hikes. Such examples are in Daltonganj where the students had to clash with the C.P.R.F personnel. In Patna engineering college the students launched a 6 day hunger strike demanding the opening of a college which had been opened earlier.D.S.U gave soli darity to this issue and burnt an effigy of the education minister. In the Jharkand areas D.S.U led struggles for tribals in schools to be taught in their native languages.In these areas D.S.U launched agitations for tribal students who were denied the right to learn in their native languages. The D.S.U also fought for democratic rights issues.Very often D.S.U organise cycle rallies as a form of protest.The most significant agitations were against police firings in Madhubani and Darsinghsarai areas of Bihar.Here D.S.U joined hands with even the revisionist student organisations as well as the Chatra Sangharsh Yuva Vahini.This took place in 1995. The D.S.U also protested against the death sentence imposed on the 13 M.CC activists in 1992.Here the D.S.U joined hands with the Revolutionary Students League and the Progresive Students and Youth front.(The 2 other revolutionary student organisations) After the Laxmanpur-Bathe massacre carried out by the Ranbir Sena the D.S.U Along with the Bharat Naujavan Sangh organised protests throughout the state.In Daltonganj,Jehanabad,Gaya,Khagaria torchlight processions were launched.In conditions of severe repression protests were launched.D.S.U joined several revolutionary organizations this issue. In 1997 D.S.U protested against the killing of 6 Party Unity activists. In Patna they burned the effigy of the chief minister.D.S.U also held commemoration programmes of the Arwal massacre that took place in 1986.In 1996 a protest meeting was clamped upon by the police and revolutionary activists were arrested. Afer the killing of Comrade Chandrashekar ,a student of J.N.U IN Delhi D.S.U launched protest programmes along with other organisations.In Jehanabad with A.I.D.S.O protests were organised in the form of torchlight processions. In 1999,D.S.U with the Bharat Naujavan Sabha took out a cycle rally from Daltangaunj to Patna protesting against the Shankar bigha massacre. Earlier in Daltonganj an effigy of the chief minister was burnt. In March 2000 D.SU led a protest with other revolutionary organisations protesting the murder of 11 revolutionaries in Kachnewan.An effigy of the Bihar administration was burnt at Patna junction.D.S.U.also participated in the march to Kachnewan as well as on a protest demonstration on April 6th. From 1995 the D.S.U Organised�Go to Village Campaigns.� These have been conducted on district as well as state levels. Their were 3 types of campaigns launched. The first was on specific political issues. The second type was a general political campaign and the third type was launching cultural programmes.The purpose of these programmes was to integrate the students and youth with the peasantry. In the first campaign in Gumrah district 6 D.S.U activists were arrested campaigning for Beedi Patta workers.The activists were organising the Beedi Patta workers against the merciless contractors who did not pay them their daily wages. The next state-wide campaign took place in 1997 in Khagaria district which is a flood prone region.Here the D.SU formed flood relief distribution commitees and explained the peasants the political reasons for which the state could not give common people protection.The flood relief programmes of the government were found to be totally inadequate and the government gave a ready excuse that Nepal has let off water.Infact the real reason was that the landlords did not allow the construction of dams at sites which would have been appropriate because those sites were falling within their lands.Infact the dam mechanism in the state was create only with the purpose of preventing waterlogging and not for flood control. In addition the boatmen were not paid their wages for the relief work. At the end of the campaign the team held public meetings and dharma demanding an end to corruption and compensation for boatmen . In 1998 the D,S.U with the Bharat Naujavan Sabha visited areas in Buxar ,Palamau Santhal Paraganas and Khagaria districts.In Buxar sustained wall-writing was carried out by activists protesting against the landlords not paying minumum wages to agricultural workers.They were paid wages between Rs.15 to 30.Landlords here possessed 5,000 acres of land and religious Maths owned hundreds of acres.districts.In Santhal Parganas the D.S.U fought for the implementation of a separate Jharkhand State. In Palamau, a centre of the revolutionary peasant movement the D.S.U fought against the construction of a dam which submerged 14 villages.20 people had been killed in the flood the previous year and no compensation was awarded.In Khagaria activists again propagated the real reasons for adequate protection being given to people during floods. The wrong policies of the government were explained. This time �Bandh Sangharsh commitees were formed in villages which held several protest meetings againt corruption. The last state-wide campaign took place in the Bhagalpur and Bankadistricts.Here the activists gave solidarity to peasant�s struggles and propagated the politics of Naxalbari and agrarian revolution.. In May 2000 the D.S.U held its first state conference in Patna..Students came from all over the state the maximum number coming from Palamau and Jehanabad and Bhagalpur districts in the former 2 districts students faced severe repression on the way to the conference. In addition students came from Buxar,Gaya,Khagariadistricts etc.Before the State conference district conferences were held in Bhagalpur.Patna town and Palamau districts.Here district commitees were formed and the district activities were reviewed. At the State conference Comrade Amitabh was elected the President and Vijay ,the secretay.A 6 member committee consisting of Amitabh,Sachin,Sumit,Pankaj,Vijay and Jaiprakash were elected. Resolutions were passed opposing privatization and communalization of education, opposing the repression on revolutionary movements and supporting the rights of nationalities to self-determination. 2 State-wide workshops were also carried out by the Democratic Students Union. The first one was held in 1999 to discuss organizational functioning, the building of unitspolititicisation methods and finance. Here principally the appropriate forms of struggle were discussed. It was decided that educational institutions were neglected and a regular wall magazine should be brought out in addition to cultural programmes.It was also noted that regular commitees were not formed in several places In the 2nd workshop in February 2000 study classes were held on the history of the Communist movement in India, the State of Education, and dialectical materialism. Delegates attended from Gaya.Palamau ,Bhagalpur and Patna. One of the most significant things that occurred was the merger of the Progressive Students and Youth Front with the D.S.U.The former organisation had a strong mass base in Bhagalpur district leading powerful agitations against fee-hikes and corruption in Bhagalpur University. This organisation also held a massive programme for Tilka Majhi�s birthday to be observed in Bhagalpur university. Several times the organisation organised gheraoes against the vice-chancellor for hostel demands. After merging into D.S.U the organisation launched a massive demonstration against the administration in Bhagalpur university house -�arresting corrupt officials. The emergence of the Democratic Students Union has played a significant role in the revolutionary movement in Bihar. Innumerable sacrifices have been made by activists. The martyrdom of comrades Anil Ojha and Chanchal were particularly significant.Anil Ojha was killed as a result of police torture after organising a student agitation against malpractices of the principal in Patna Arts College.Chanchal played a great role in organising D.S.U units in Jehanabad districts as well as building the Bharat Naujavan Sabha.Eventually he was killed by his own relatives. However the movement has had several setbacks.As a result of severe repression by the state on the peasant movement the D.S.U has been unable to function openly in many areas of the State. The best examples are Palamau and Jehanabad.Here activists have often been arrested for carrying out open prograames.Even in Khagaria the D.SU which earlier had a unit has been unable to function. The only prominent areas of functioning are in Bhagalpur and Patna. Although activists have made heroic political sacrifices as a result of the powerful left-sectarian trend in the movement various weaknesses have occurred in the movement. More recent struggles Lawyers Movement Another significant development in the movement in Bihar was the formation of a Democratic Lawyers Organisation called the Radical Lawyers forum in Patna High Court. It pledged to give solidarity to the revolutionary peasant movement by fighting against the ban undemocratic organizations and for the release of wrongly convicted prisoners. They also appealed against for the termination of group clashes between the C.P.I.M.L(Peoples War Group)and the M.C C. The Lawyers who predominantly participated I the formation were Ved Prakash, VisheshwarRam,Medni Kant Jha,Umanath Mishraa,d B.S Upadhya.They pledged against fighting for the repeal of Black Laws, for the democratic rights for political prisoners in jail, for rights of women Etc.They condemned the false encounter in Rajaun Thana in Banka District. Such a Lawyers organization is important for the protection of democratic rights and some good work was done in court. Research on the Movement by Scholar Bela Bhatia Social activist and rsearch worker Bela Bhatia interviewed activists of the Mazdoor Kisan angram Samiti(M.K S S.).Below I am quoting an excerpt fro her interview. �Feudalismwill have to be rooted out steadily,otherwise it will uprootyou.It lies like a shadow to every person and untiolit is rooted out revolution canot be achieved. Before the organization came we did not have knowledge. The organization gave us education regarding the present system and he need to overthrow it.India is a semi-colonial and semi-feudal Country. There is foreign capital also in our country. We have o en this foreign capital an utilize the capital of our own country.T he downtrodden people have to rise above the system.Each individual should get education. We got books to read about Marx,Lenin and Mao From these we learnt that Mao was a revolutionary and so were Lenin and Mao Tse Tungse read alittele about all the 3.We have not read a lot but understood that what Marx and Lenin wanted to say was that this rotten system should be destroyed, the exploitation of one human being by another should end, human kin should be liberated from this. This is what the leaders have to say. Below I am publishing some testimonies of leading members of the M.K S.S on revolutionary violence. “Without arms we feel that we shall not be able to fight. With arms we feel confident ,we will have the power. We fell that we will be able to settle he fight. If e do not have the armed power ,then how will we counter the Landlord�s anger. Can his anger be countered by wagging our finger at him? Without armed power it is impossible to ensure peoples protection. If we do not have arms then no one will take our committee seriously. Each will do according to his will. They will think �What can they do to us.� When this power is their,they will fear.They know that if thy do not obey us the we have the power to destroy them. There will be lot of problems. We may even be killed During this period ,many have been matyred .Seeds are sown I he field in hope that they will grow. Similarly, with a dream of Socialism we are walking. The poesession of arms helped resolve some conflicts without actual resort to violence In Nyona village a wage issue was resolved peacefully because of the armed capacity of the organisation. A villager stated �Because we have arms ,the zamindars have shrunk with fear. Also gangs of bandits and dacoits ,who used to lot peole�s houses ,have been vanquished. Because of the atrocities ,the people used to feel very insecure. This has come to an end. I am quoting another passage fro Bela Bhatia’sinterview. A senior memer of the M.K S S stated: In 1979 there was an atmosphere of terror in the villages due to the feudal forces and criminal gangs.Even though he labourers had heard about us they we too scared to call us. However we were able to establish contact with few members of he J.P Movement,and asked him to arrange a meeting with few labourers introducing us as individuals who belonged to a party of the poor.On the agreed day we met at midnight In the fields. Instead of meeting a small group we met about 50 men.They were armed with lathis ,bhals and gadasas. The terrorized villagers explained that they would have taken the activists to the village but it was too risky.The �Maliks� had warned them that they would be severely punished if they brought he naxalites to the village..We activisists,emphasized the issues of izzat,wages,land abd basic democratic rights,but explained that it could only be done by our own strength. The People understood this stating, �We have understood .You are Naxalites,you talk about strength.� People now started coming in large numbrs.At first they were hesitant to speak out. Finally one of them spoke out,�We will now be coming to the meeting,expecting each time to get arms.If you are demanding confrontation and armed revolution,should you not provide us with arms.�Thus ,I actual fact, they were demanding arms.� Such incidents show the mass approach of the M.K S.S Analysis of C.P.I(M.L) Party Unity Group From the time of formation in January 1982 it�s contribution was of historic importance.In many way�s the group had an intermediate line between the C.P.I(M.Liberaton)group and the Maoist Communist Centre.The methods they deployed to create mass movements were a great lesson for revolutionaries ,particularly the methods they deployed to build the Mazdur Kisan Sangram Samiti.A huge range of struggle methods were deployed and a great effort was made to rectify the negative effect of the Charu Mazumdar line.Unlike the Maoist Communist Centre they considered forming a revolutionary peasant organization as integral to the movement.It played amajor role in theoretically forming the All India Peoples Resistance Forum and implementing it’s line in practice.It’s role was remarkable in the 1994 All India Peoples Resistance forum rally in Calcutta. They made a calculated assault and tactfully first concentrated on exposing the landlord gangs.True the way they connected armed guerilla squads to the peasant organizations was defective ,but still they carried out he mass line to a greater degree than the Maoist Communist Centre or the Liberation Group.It was really remarkable the way they revived the banned Mazdur Kisan Sangraami Samiti which was banned I 1986 to the ‘Jan Sangarm Samiti, ‘’Mazdur Kisan Mukti Manch’ and later I 1994 to the ‘Mazdur Kisan Sangrami Parishad.’One weakness was the inability of the organisation to raech acorrect line on China till 1989.Till then it upheld China as a Socialist Country and also upheld the heory of 3 Worlds. They also led struggles of middle peasants.The author first met their activists in Mumbai in July 1990 when they came on a programme representing the organizations mass revolutionary Front-of 7 mass organsiations �the Lok Sangram Morcha.Activists now clearly understood the revisionist character of Liberation Group�s line.It was attribute that 2 Part Unity mass leaders held open programes against state repression. . In the author�s view it is a tribute to he resilience of the Party Unity Group that such a revolutionary mass movement was sustained against a powerful enemy. Movements were formed on alL fronts. In so many spheres truggles were carried out.DEmocartic Rights Struggles,land struggles ,struggles on International issues,struggles against Communnalism.Etc.The work was particularly outstanding in Jehanabad and Palamau and effectively spread to other areas like Gaya,Aurangabad,Khagaria,Buxar,Begusurai Rohtas,Etc.Thereawas graet versatility in the ormsof struggles which even went o the extent of defending fishing rights.Open mass Movements were brilliantly combined with secret movements. To quite a extent it applied Mao’s line of protracted warfare where a base area is consolidated.I was also impressed with the youth organization struggles like cycle rallies Etc.However defective military line led to defective approach in the preparation of guerilla Zones,or their conversion to base areas. The methods used to create armed wings which were attached to mass peasant organizations as a military combat force were also defective.(armed wings at
  2. I am writing a story of my woes at the hands of Government Machinery in Agriculture Department in Bihar. I had even made a complaint some days ago against one IPS officer and had said that interpretation of one and the same law changes ways with change in the name of the officer has become a fashion of Bihar Government officials who have been endowed with responsibilities. They are always after finding disabling clauses of the established principles of law and justyice against the general population ,very few of them however, sometimes search for enabling lines in the law ,but these type often land themselves up in facing accusations of favouritism .Due to this misinerpretation general polulation is turning to violence when justice is not meted out to them for their genuine grievances and maoism or naxalism is the place where they have to travel to .In my opinion maoism or naxalism is nothing but a stage where suppresssed feelings of the general population is exhibited ,when justice becomes unachievable. I am with Maos and naxals now ,atleast I agree with their ideology of forcing the government to surrender when sins of the government servants they beome intolerable .But killing people is an act of cowardice which they should shun. I am writinf here below my one of the tale with a description of bravery and valour of the government servants and which underlines the सदाचार of Nitishji. महाशय , मैं कम से कम दस बार माननीय मुख्य मंत्री जी के grievance cell में अपनी व्यथा के बारे में लिख चूका हूँ | हमारी एक औद्योगिक इकाई जिसका नाम हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स प्राइवेट लिमिटेड है विगत ३० सालों से कार्यरत थी |दिनांक १८.१२.२०१० से यह कारखाना कृषि विभाग ,बिहार द्वारा बंद करवाया जा चूका है | कृषि विभाग में कार्यरत एक पदाधिकारी जिसका नाम संजय सिंह है जिसकी मूल पदस्थापना कृषि विभाग के सांख्यिकी विभाग में है लेकिन इनको कतिपय कारणों से कृषि विभाग के राज्यस्तरीय उर्वरक कोषांग , का प्रभारी २००७ से ही बना दिया गया था जब श्री बी. राजेंद्र कृषि निदेशक थे | इनके अत्याचारों की कहानी इस प्रकार है :- १.इस कहानी की पहली कड़ी तो इसने २००७ में ही शुरू कर दी थी| २.कम शब्दों में कहना यह है की ९.०३.२०१० को ही हमलोगों ने (within specified time) अपने उर्वरक विनिर्माण और विपणन की अलग अलग अनुज्ञप्तियां के नवीनीकरण के लिए आवेदन कृषि विभाग को समर्पित कर दिया था| ३. २० मई २०१० को (करीब ७० दिनों पश्चात )कृषि निदेशक महोदय ने हमारे प्रतिष्ठान में स्थापित उर्वरक गुण विश्लेषण प्रयोगशाला की जांच करवाई |इस जांच दल में श्री बैद्यनाथ यादव ,तत्कालीन उप कृषि निदेशक (मीठापुर गुण नियंत्रण प्रयोगशाला ),श्री अशोक प्रसाद ,उप कृषि निदेशक (मुख्यालय ) थे | ४. इन लोगों ने अपने जांचोपरांत प्रतिवेदन में निम्नलिखित बातों को दर्शाया :- (क)प्रतिष्ठान में संचालित प्रयोगशाला में यन्त्र एवं उपकरण कार्यशील पाए गए |प्रयोगशाला में अपर्याप्त संख्या में यन्त्र और उपकरण पाया गया |प्रयोगशाला सीमित जांच सुविधा के साथ कार्यशील पाया गया | (ख)रसायनज्ञ कार्यरत है एवं उसे विश्लेषण कार्य की जानकारी है | (ग)विनिर्माण हेतु आधारभूत संरचना -उपलब्ध है तथा चालू हालत में है | ५.इसके अलावा यह भी कहा गया की प्रतिष्ठान में विनिर्माण इकाई में उत्पादित उर्वरक के प्रयोगशाला में गुणात्मक जांच सम्बन्धी अभिलेख आंकड़ा आदि संधारित नहीं पाया गया (ख)उर्वरक सम्बन्धी कच्चा माल स्थानीय थोक विक्रेता शिवनारायण चिरंजीलाल से मुख्य रूप से प्राप्त किये जाते हैं एवं उत्पादित उर्वरक का अधिक से अधिक हिस्सा इसी प्रतिष्ठान के माध्यम से बेचे जाते हैं | (ग)एन. पी. के.मिक्सचर विनिर्माण इकाइयों को कच्चा माल के रूप में उर्वरक आपूर्ति हेतु भारत सरकार से समय समय पर निर्गत निदेश और इससे सम्बंधित अद्यतन निदेश (२३०११ /१/२०१० -एम्.पी.आर. दिनांक ०४.०३.२०१० )जिससे वे अवगत हैं का अनुपालन नहीं किया जा रहा है | ६.इसी बीच दिनांक २०.०७.२०१० को कृषि निदेशक महोदय ने हमारा विनिर्माण / विपणन प्रमाण पत्र हेतु समर्पित आवेदनों को अस्वीकृत कर दिया और इस आदेश में यह भी दर्शाया की इस उनके आदेश के विरूद्ध ३० दिनों के अंदर हमलोग कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त ,बिहार पटना के यहाँ अपील दायर कर सकते हैं |आदेश संख्या ८९८/२३.०७.२०१० . ७. हमलोगों ने विधिवत अपनी अपील कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त महोदय के यहाँ समर्पित ३०.०७.२०१० को ही कर दी| ८.कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त महोदय के यहाँ से ६० दिनों बाद अपील का आदेश प्राप्त हुआ जिसमे प्रमुख बातें इस प्रकार है :- “रसायन एवं उर्वरक मंत्रालय ,भारत सरकार के पत्र संख्या २३०११ दिनांक ४.०३.२०१० में यह स्पष्ट है की ‘manufacturers of custimsed fertilizers and mixture fertilizers will be eligible to source subsidised fertilizers from the manufacturers/importers after their receipt in the districts as input for manufacturing customised fertilisers and mixture fertilizers for agriculture purpose .’ इस पत्र से यह स्पष्ट होता है की मिश्रित उर्वरक विनिर्माताओं को अनुदानित उर्वरक उपयोग करना की अनुमति है |राज्य के लिए आवंटित अनुदानित उर्वरक की आपूर्ति manufacturers /importers द्वारा की जाती है ,जिसका वितरण थोक विक्रेता के माध्यम से किया जाता है |राज्य को आवंटित अनुदानित उर्वरक के कोटा में से ही मिश्रित उर्वरक विनिर्माताओं को उर्वरक उपलब्ध कराया जाना है |मिश्रित उर्वरक विनिर्माताओं की आवश्यकता की पूर्ति के लिए अगर अतिरिक्त अनुदानित उर्वरक की आवश्यकता हो तो उसकी मांग निदेशक ,कृषि रसायन एवं उर्वरक मंत्रालय ,भारत सरकार से कर सकते हैं |सभी पहलू पर विचार करते हुए यह आदेश दिया जाता है की तत्काल जिले के लिए आवंटित उर्वरक के कुछ प्रतिशत जिला कृषि पदाधिकारी मिश्रित उर्वरक विनिर्माताओं को उपलब्ध करायेंगे ,इस हेतु निदेशक ,कृषि सम्बंधित जिला कृषि पदाधिकारी को आवश्यक निदेश देंगे | ‘कृषि मंत्रालय की अधिसूचना दिनांक १६.०४.१९९१ में यह स्पष्ट किया गया है की सभी एन.पी.के. मिश्रण विनिर्माताओं को अधिसूचना में उल्लेख किये गए न्यूनतम उपकरण को प्रयोगशाला में रखना ही होगा | ‘सभी तथ्यों पर गंभीरता से विचार करते हुए यह आदेश दिया जाता है की अपीलकर्ता प्रयोगशाला में सभी न्यूनतम उपकरणों की व्यवस्था कर निदेशक ,कृषि को सूचित करेंगे |निदेशक,कृषि आवश्यक जांच कर संतुष्ट होने पर अपीलकर्ता के विनिर्माण प्रमाणपत्र को नवीकृत करेंगे |निदेशक,कृषि विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र निर्गत करते समय विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र के नवीकृत करने पर भी विचार करेंगे |’ (N.B. :- this is verbatim replication of the order of APC,Bihar dated 30.09.2010 bearing no.4964.This order bears the signature of Sri K.C. Saha while he held the charge of APC when Sri A.K.sinha had gone on a long leave. ) ९. ३०.०९.२०१० को ही हमलोगों ने अपने प्रयोगशाला में सभी अनावश्यक(जिस उपकरण का आज के परिवेश में कोई मान्यता नहीं रह जाती है जैसे chemical Balance in place of electronic digital balance) /आवश्यक उपकरणों की खरीद कर instal कर देने सम्बन्धी पत्र निदेशक कृषि को पत्र द्वारा सूचित कर दिया और इसकी एक प्रति कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त महोदय को भी दे दी | १०.कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त महोदय के इस आदेश को कतिपय कारणों से कृषि निदेशक महोदय को प्राप्त होने में काफी विलम्ब हुआ ,इसी कारण दिनांक २२.१०.२०१० को कृषि निदेशक महोदय के यहाँ से एक पत्र द्वारा त्रिसदस्सीय दल की गठन का आदेश निकला जिसको यह कहा गया की प्रतिष्ठान के प्रयोगशाला को पुनः जांच की जाये.|स्पष्ट है की कुछ सीढियों के अंतर पर ही ये दोनों कार्यालय नया सचिवालय ,पटना में है लेकिन” २२ “दिनों के बाद ही कृषि निदेशक महोदय प्रतिष्ठान के प्रयोगशाला सम्बन्धी जांच के आदेश दे पाए | ११. लेकिन यहाँ मात्र एक जांच सम्बन्धी आदेश को निकालने में २२ दिन लगे ,फिर २३.११.२०१०(याने इस जांच दल के गतःन होने के बाद ) को ही इस त्रिसदस्सीय जांच दल ने हमारे प्रतिष्ठान के प्रयोगशाळा की जांच की ,यानी एक महीने १ दिन बाद ही यह संभव हो पाया |स्पष्ट है की कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त महोदय के आदेश के ५३ वे दिन बाद हमारी प्रयोगशाला की जांच हो पायी| १२.इस जांच प्रतिवेदन में जांच दल ने निष्कर्ष में प्रतिवेदित किया की :- “उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ की धारा २१ (ए) के तहत उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के पास न्यूनतम प्रयोगशाला की सुविधा एवं उपरोक्त वर्णित उपकरण उपलब्ध हैं तथा उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ की धारा २१ (ए) का पूर्ण रूपेण पालन किया गया है |अतः उक्त प्रतिष्ठान के विनिर्माण पंजीकरण प्रमाण पत्र को नवीकरण करने हेतु विचार किया जा सकता है|”(this is again an exact replication of the report of findings of the three member inspecting team which is dated 23.11.2010). १३.हमलोगों ने २.११.२०१० से अपने इकाई का उत्पादन शुरू कर दिया था|इस आशय की सूचना विधिवत कृषि निदेशक महोदय को दे दी गयी थी | उत्पादन शुरू करने के मुख्य तीन कारण थे जो इस प्रकार हैं:- (क) कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त महोदय के आदेश के उपरांत कृषि निदेशालय द्वारा अनावश्यक विलम्ब हो रहा था ,फिर भी इस आदेश के १ महीने दो दिन बाद (यानी ३२ दिनों बाद )काफी इंतज़ार करने के बाद रबी सीजन के चालू हो जाने के आलोक में ,कृषकों के भी व्यापक हित में तथा मजदूर जो बहुत दिनों से बैठे हुए थे के कारण उत्पादन प्रारम्भ कृषि निदेशक को सूचित करते हुए कर दिया गया | (ख)कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त महोदय के आदेश में यह दर्शाया गया है की “तत्काल जिले के लिए आवंटित उर्वरक के कुछ प्रतिशत जिला कृषि पदाधिकारी मिश्रित उर्वरक विनिर्माताओं को उपलब्ध कराएँगे “इससे यह स्पष्ट हो जाता है की उत्पादन चालु रखने के लिए ही ऐसे आदेश को पारित किया गया है | (ग)विनिर्माण और विपणन प्राधिकार पत्रों की नवीकरण का कृषि निदेशक महोदय द्वारा अस्वीकृत कर दिए जाने के उपरान्त कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त के आदेश से अस्वीकृति का आदेश स्वतः विलोपित हो जाता है और उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ की धारा १८(४) जो इस प्रकार है :- “where the application for renewal is made within the time specified in sub-clause (1)or sub-clause (3),the applicant shall be deemed to have held a vaid {certificate of manufacture}until such date as the registering authority passes order on application for renewal .”इसी तरह विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र के बारे में धारा ११(४) है .इन धाराओं के तहत हमलोगों ने उत्पादन शुरू किया जो हमारी महीनों से बंद पड़े प्लांट जो उर्वरक के कारण जंग खा रहा था ,कृषकों को रबी सीजन में संतुलित दानेदार की उपलब्धता को बनाये रखने के लिए तथा भूखमरी की समस्या से ग्रसित मजदूरों को त्राण दिलवाने की मंशा से ऐसा कदम उठा कर कोई पाप नहीं किया गया था |यह उद्योग विगत ३० वर्षों से स्थापित है और हमारी अनुज्ञप्तियों की नवीनीकरण की प्रक्रिया कम से कम दस बार विभाग द्वारा पूर्व में भी अपनाई गयी है | १४.दिनांक १८.१२.२०१० को कृषि निदेशक महोदय ने एक आदेश निकाला की (जो जिला कृषि पदाधिकारी,अररिया के नाम से प्रेषित था )”आपको आदेश दिया जाता है की में.हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स प्रा. ली. की फारविसगंज एवं पूर्णिया इकाई को पत्र प्राप्ति के साथ ही जांच कर लें एवं यदि विनिर्माण कार्य चालू रहने एवं उर्वरक विपणन का साक्षय पाया जाता है तो प्रतिष्ठान के प्रोपराइटर एवं प्रबंधन के विरूद्ध उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड ७ एवं १२ का उल्लंघन करने के आरोप में आवश्यक वस्तु अधिनियम की धारा ७ के अंतर्गत साक्षय जुटाते हुए स्थानीय थाना में प्राथमिकी दर्ज कर दोनों संयंत्र को सील करने की त्वरित कार्रवाई करें|कृत कार्रवाईका प्रतिवेदन लौटती डाक से उपलब्ध कराया जाये|” इस सन्दर्भ में कृषि निदेशक का पत्र संख्या १४२७ दिनांक १५.१२.२०१० निर्गत हुआ है | १५.इसके उपरान्त दिनांक १८.१२ २०१० को जिला कृषि पदाधिकारी श्री बैद्यनाथ यादव ने परियोजना कार्यपालक पदाधिकारी ,फारविसगंज श्री मक्केश्वर पासवान को आदेश देकर १८.१२.२०१० को ही सील करवा दिया और दिनांक १९.१२.२०१० को फारविसगंज थाने में प्राथमिकी दर्ज करवा दी गयी |दर्ज प्राथमिकी की भाषा इस प्रकार है :-“उपरोक्त विषय के सम्बन्ध में जिला कृषि पदाधिकारी ,अररिया के पत्रांक १०६५ दिनांक १८.१२ २०१० एवं कृषि निदेशक ,बिहार ,पटना के पत्र संख्या १४२७ दिनांक १५.१२.२०१० के द्वारा दिए गए निदेश के अनुपालन में में. हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स प्रा. ली. ,रानीगंज रोड ,फारविसगंज की जांच की गयी |जांच के समय फेक्ट्री बंद पायी गयी किन्तु भण्डार पंजी एवं वितरण पंजी के अवलोकन से ज्ञात होता है की फेक्ट्री में विनिर्माण कार्य कराया जाता रहा है |दिनांक १.१२.२०१० को मेरे द्वारा भण्डार पंजी एवं विक्री पंजी की जांच की गयी थी जिसमे विनिर्मित NPK धनवर्षा हरासोना १८:१८:१० भण्डार में कुल 105 of 50 kgs पाया गया था किन्तु दिनांक १८.१२.२०१० तक विनिर्मित NPK हरासोना १८:१८:१० ७४१५ बोरा ५०के.जी. विक्री दिखाया गया है इस प्रकार दिसंबर माह में कुल ७३१० बोरा ५० के.जी. का विनिर्माण में. हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स ,फारविसगंज द्वारा किया गया है जो उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड (७)एवं (१२) का उल्लंघन किया गया है जो की गैर कानूनी और अवैध है | अतः में. हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स ,रानीगंज रोड ,फारविसगंज के द्वारा वगैर लाइसेंस नवीकरण कराये विनिर्माण इकाई में विनिर्माण एवं बिक्री करने के आरोप में प्रतिष्ठान के प्रबंधक सह प्रबंध निदेशक श्री शम्भू गोयल पिता ओंकार मल अग्रवाल छुआ पट्टी रोड वार्ड न. १७ नगर परिषद ,फारविसगंज के विरूद्ध प्रथ्मिनकी दर्ज की जाती है”|यह कार्य दिनांक १९.१२.२०१० को करवाया जाता है | १६.इसी तरह हमारे पूर्णिया इकाई को भी बंद करवा दिया जाता है और १९.१२.२०१० को ही प्राथमिकी दर्ज कर दी गयी | १७ कृषि निदेशालय में अनावश्यक विलम्ब हो रहा था इसका प्रमाण ऊपर अंकित विभिन्न तिथियों से स्वतः ज्ञात हो सकता है |संजय सिंह द्वारा इनकी बदनीयती से सृजित कथा का अंत यहीं नहीं होता है |हमलोगों ने इनलोगों के द्वारा अपनाई गयी प्रताड़ित करने की प्रक्रिया को देखते हुए माननीय उच्च न्यायालय में एक writ petition भी दिया था ,संजोग से जिसकी सुनवाई २०.१२.२०१० को हो गयी और उच्च न्यायलय द्वारा आदेश जो दिया गया वो इस प्रकार है : CWJC NO.20251 of 2010 :- “From the facts and circustances of this case , is quite apprent that the matter for renewal of Certificate of Registration for manufacturing and sale of Mixture of Fertilizers is pending before the Director,Agriculture ,Government of Bihar since 30.09.2010 when order passed by the Agriculture Production Commissioner ,Bihar in Appeal no. 7 of 2010 was communicated. 3.Let the said matter be considered and disposed of by the Director,Agriculture within aperiod of three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.It may be noted that violation of this order shall entail serious consequences and will be deemed as contempt of court and this court shall be constrained to take actions against the contemnor . 4.A copyof this order be handed over to Government Advocate IV for proper compliance of this order.” १८.हाई कोर्ट के इस आदेश के विभाग में पहुँचने के बाद महज एक खानापूर्ति करने के लिए दिनांक २७.१२.२०१० को एक पत्र जिसका पत्रांक १४७० दिनांक २७.१२.२०१० कृषि निदेशालय से हमारे नाम से स्पष्टीकरण मांगने के लिए प्रेषित किया जाता है जो इस प्रकार है :- “उपर्युक्त विषयक कहना है की कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त के आदेश ज्ञापांक ४९६४ दिनांक ३०.०९.२०१० के आलोक में आपके प्रतिष्ठान के NPK मिश्रण विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र के नवीकरण की कार्रवाई प्रक्रियाधीन थी|इस बीच आपने अपने पत्र संख्या HAC –OUTLET CMD/10/235/01 दिनांक 22.11.2010 के द्वारा सूचित किया है की आपके द्वारा NPK मिश्रण का विनिर्माण कार्य प्रारम्भ कर दिया गया है |आप अवगत हैं की बिना विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र विनिर्माण कार्य करना उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड १२ का उल्लंघन है|आपके द्वारा बिना विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र प्राप्त किया ही विनिर्माण कार्य प्रारम्भ कर दिया गया है जो उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड १२ का उल्लंघन है और आपका कृत उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश के विरूद्ध है तथा गैर कानूनी है | अतः आप स्पष्ट करें की उपरोक्त आरोप के आलोक में क्यों नहीं आपके प्रतिष्ठान का विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र के नवीकरण हेतु आपसे प्राप्त आवेदन को उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश के खाद १८(२) के अंतर्गत अस्वीकृत कर दिया जाए |आप अपना स्पष्टीकरण दिनांक ०३.०१.२०११ तक अवश्य समर्पित करें अन्यथा एकतरफा निर्णय ले लिया जाएगा “ | (N.B. विभाग द्वारा स्वयं ही यह स्वीकार किया जा रहा है की हमारे मिश्रण विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र के “नवीकरण “की कार्रवाई प्रक्रियाधीन थी |तब हमपर क्या नवीकरण की धाराओं के उल्लंघन में आरोप लगाना उचित होगा या की नए अनुज्ञप्ति पंजीकरण की धाराओं के उल्लंघन का आरोप लगाना कहाँ तक उचित होता है |ऐसे भी यह एक गहन चिंता का विषय है की प्राथमिकी दर्ज करवाने के निमित्त पत्र में खंड १२ और ७ के उल्लंघन का उल्लेख है जबकि स्पष्टीकरण में खंड १८(२) के उल्लंघन का आरोप भी लगाया जा रहा है | एक सोची समझी हुई बदनीयती की तहत एक साजिश कर के प्राथमिकी के उपरान्त स्पष्टीकरण पूछने का एक ही तात्पर्य है की जिससे उच्च न्यायालय को पुख्ता जवाब दिया जा सके |ऐसे प्राथमिकी हो जाने के बाद ऐसे स्पष्टीकरण को कोई औचित्य ही नहीं रह जाता है | संजय सिंह की मंशा तो शुरू से ही थी की रु. १० लाख मिलने के बाद ही नवीकरण किया जाएगा |यह गैर कानूनी उगाही न होते देख इस व्यक्ति ने अपनी सारी ताकत झोंक कर और एक खास बेईमानी की नियत से न सिर्फ विभाग का समय बर्बाद करवाया है ,इसके साथ सैकड़ों मजदूरों को भी बेरोजगार कर दिया है ,लाखों रुपैये की खाद को पानी में परिवर्तित होकर बह जाने की खास कोशिश की है |हमारी बर्बादी करना तो इसके जेहन में २००७ से समा गयी थी जब यह व्यक्ति उल्टा सीधा आदेश डा. बी. राजेंद्र जी से करवाना शुरू कर दिया था |पर बिहार में भारतीय प्रशासनिक सेवा के ऐसे पदाधिकारी उल्टा सीधा आदेश देते ही रहते हैं जिससे इनका प्रभुत्व कायम रहे ,भले ही जनता का नुकसान होते रहे ,कम से कम कोर्ट कचहरी के चक्कर में समय तो बर्बाद ये पदाधिकारी करवा ही देते हैं और इसी में इनको दीखता है अपना बांकपन ,अपनी शक्ति |इन लोगों को यह भी शर्म नही है की कोर्ट के आदेश किस कदर इनके मुहं पर तमाचा लगाते है |कोर्ट ने इनके और एक खास कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त के ऐसे ही आदेश के विरूद्ध एक अन्य मामले में जो हमारे मामले से हूबहू मिलता जुलता है में टिप्पणी की थी वो इस प्रकार है :- CWJC 16645 of 2010 order dated 1.10.2010 – “It is evident from the impugned order that they suffer from non-application of mind to the requirements of the Fertilizer Control Order not only with respect to the facts of the case but also the requirement of law . “Once the petitioner had taken the stand that shortage of equipments in the laboratory was rectified,either the respondent authorities ought have accepted the same or they could have made inspection of the Laboratory to verify the statements made and thereafter appropriate orders should have been passed keeping in view the valuable rights of the petitioner involved in the matter . “On consideration of the entire facts and circumstances the order dated 4.06.2010 of the Director,Agriculture and 13.09.2010 of the Agriculture Production Commissioner are set aside and the matter is remanded to the Director ,Agriculture to consider the question of renewal of the registration certificate of the petitioner in accordance with law after considering the documents submitted by the petitioner and,if necessary by getting the inspection of the petitioner’s laboratory done by a team of competent Officers . “Let the application for renewal of the petioner be considered and disposed of within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt /production of a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of with the afore said observations and directions .” Sd/- Ramesh Kumar Dutta ,J. लेकिन शर्म तो इन प्रशासनिक पदाधिकारियों ने एक दानवी हैवान के पहलू में गिरवी रख दी है |इसका एक खास कारण यह भी है की ऐसे पदाधिकारिओं का मान बढ़ता है चोर और सिरफिरे राजनीतिज्ञों का प्रश्रय मिलने पर |और कम से कम आज के कृषि विभाग में ऐसा ही हो रहा है | १९.दिनांक २०.१२.२०१० के उच्च न्यायालय के आदेश के आलोक में उच्च न्यायालय के निर्देशानुसार हमारे अनुज्ञप्ति नवीकरण को नहीं करके कृषि निदेशक ने आदेश संख्या २५ दिनांक ७.०१.२०११ को हमारे आवेदन को पुनः अस्वीकृत कर दिया वह भी जब उच्च न्यायालय ने स्पष्ट कर दिया था की “matter for renewal of certificate of Registration for manufacture and sale of Mixture of fertilizers is pending before the Director,Agriculture ,Government of Bihar since 30.09.2010 when order passed by Agriculture Production Commissioner,Bihar in appeal no. 7 of 2010 was communicated “. कृषि निदेशक ने इस मद में एक आदेश निकाला जो दिनांक ६.०१.२०११ को दस्तखत किया गया और वह इस प्रकार है :- प्वाइंट नो. ६ .”प्रतिष्ठान से प्राप्त स्पस्टीकरण संतोषप्रद एवं स्वीकार्य नहीं है |प्रतिष्ठान की ओर से प्राप्त स्पस्टीकरण से स्पस्ट होता है की उनके द्वारा उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड १८(४)एवं ११(४)के अंतर्गत प्रतिष्ठान के विनिर्माण एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र को वैध माना गया है |इस सम्बन्ध में उक्त दोनों खण्डों का उल्लेख करना समीचीन प्रतीत होता है |खंड १८(४) निम्नवत है :- “where the application for renewal is made within the time specified in sub-clause (1)or sub-clause (3),the applicant shall be deemed to have held a valid certificate of manufacture until such date as the registering authority passes order on application for renewal “ तथा ११(४) निम्नवत है :- “where the application for renewal of certificate of registration is made within the time specified in sub-clause (1)or sub-clause (3),the applicant shall be deemed to have held a valid certificate of registration until such date as the controller passes order on application for renewal” उपरोक्त दोनों खण्डों के अवलोकन से स्पष्ट है की नवीकरण हेतु लंबित विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र उस अवधि तक वैध है जब तक की पंजीकरण पदाधिकारी के द्वारा आदेश पारित नहीं कर दिया जाय |में. हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स प्रा. ली. के मामले में प्रतिष्ठान का नवीकरण हेतु प्राप्त आवेदन अद्योहसताक्षरी के आदेश दिनांक २३.०७.१० के द्वारा अस्वीकृत किया जा चूका है |अतः उर्वरक नियत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड १८(४) एवं ११(४) के अनुसार दिनांक २३.०७.२०१० को प्रतिष्ठान के विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र की वैधता समाप्त हो चुकी है | प्वाइंट न..७ :-कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त के द्वारा अपील -७/२०१० में पारित आदेश में कृषि निदेशक को निदेश दिया गया था की अपीलकर्ता के प्रयोगशाला में सभी न्यूनतम उपकरणों की जांच कर संतुष्ट होने पर अपीलकर्ता के विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र को नवीकृत करेंगे एवं इसे निर्गत करते समत विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र को नवीकृत करने पर विचार करेंगे |अपिलवाद के दिए गये आदेश के आलोक में प्रयोगशाला की सुविधा की जांच कर अग्रेतर कार्रवाही की जा रही थी |परन्तु इसी बीच में हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स प्रा. ली. के द्वारा अनाधिकृत रूप से विनिर्माण एवं विपणन कार्य प्रारम्भ कर दिया गया जबकि अध्योहस्ताक्षरी के द्वारा कृषि निदेशालय के ज्ञापांक ८९८ दिनांक २३.०७.२०१० को संशोधन करने सम्बन्धी कोई भी आदेश निर्गत नहीं किया गया |इस परिस्थति में में. हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स प्रा.ली. के द्वारा किया गया विनिर्माण एवं विपणन कार्य बिना विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र प्राप्त किये किया गया है जो उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ क्र खंड १२ एवं ७ का उल्लंघन है एवं जिसके लिए प्रतिष्ठान के विरूद्ध के. हाट थाना, पूर्णिया एवं फारविसगंज थाना ,अररिया में प्राथमिकी दर्ज की जा चुकी है | प्वाइंट न. ८ :-उपरोक्त तथ्यों से स्पष्ट है की में. हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स प्रा. ली. के द्वारा विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र के बिना उर्वरक मिश्रण का विनिर्माण एवं विपणन कार्य कर उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड १२ एवं ७ का उल्लंघन किया गया है |प्रतिष्ठान के द्वारा उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश के उपरोक्त खंड को उल्लंघन करने के आरोप में दिनांक ३०.०९.२०१० को में. हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स प्रा. ली. के द्वारा समर्पित विनिर्माण एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र के नवीकरण हेतु आवेदन को अस्वीकृत किया जाता है |” N.B. कृषि निदेशक के इस आदेश से निम्न बातें साफ़-साफ़ स्पष्ट हो जाती हैं:- (क)हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स के इस मामले में उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के तहत खंड १२ एवं खंड ७ ही लागू होगा न की खंड १८(४) एवं ११(४) (ख)कृषि निदेशालय के उपर्वर्नित पत्राचार से यह भी साफ़ हो जाता है की यह मामला नवीकरण का न होकर नए अनुज्ञप्ति पंजीकरण का ही होगा | जबकि यह भी सत्य है की यह फेक्ट्री विगत ३० वर्षों से कार्यरत है और १० बार इसकी अनुज्ञप्तियों का नवीकरण हो चूका है |इसका मतलब सीधा है की कृषि निदेशालय के अनुसार इन अनुज्ञप्तियों का स्वतः deregistration हो चुका है |भविष्य में हमारा पंजीकरण नए रूप में हो भी सकता है और नहीं भी हो सकता है |होगा तभी जब इन लोगों को हम विधाता माने और इनकी पूजा अर्चना करें| (ग) यह भी साफ़ हो जाता है की कृषि निदेशालय में कृषि निदेशक श्री अरविंदर सिंह और संजय सिंह के मन में जो आएगा वो ये करेंगे और न उच्च न्यायालय का कोई आदेश इन लोगों पर लागू होता और न ही कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त का, क्योंकि कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त महोदय के आदेश के बाद हमारी प्रयोगशाला में निर्धारित उपकरणों की व्यवस्था कर ली गयी है जिसकी सूचना हमलोगों ने ३०.०९.२०१० को ही दे दी थी,इनलोगों ने इस आदेश के ५३ वे दिन बाद ही हमारे प्रयोगशाला को जांच करवाया | (घ)इतना ही नहीं प्रयोगशाला के जांचोपरांत दिनांक २३.११,२०१० को जोविभाग द्वारा सम्भव हो पाया ,इस जांच प्रतिवेदन में साफ़ –साफ़ यह प्रतिवेदित है की उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ की धारा २१(ए) का प्रतिष्ठान द्वारा पूर्णरूपेण पालन कर लिया गया है ,के बाद भी २३ दिन बीत जाने के बाद याने १८.१२.२०१० तक भी नवीकरण करने की कोई प्रक्रिया सिर्फ विचाराधीन थी या यह कहा जाए की हमलोगों पर प्राथमिकी दर्ज और संयंत्र को सील करवाने की प्रक्रिया करने की जुगत में इन २३ दिनों में ये दोनों महानुभाव लगे हुए थे और अंततःइनलोगों ने एक हैवानियत का उदहारण देते हुए हमलोगों पर प्राथमिकी और संयंत्र को सील करवाने की प्रक्रिया को अंजाम दे ही दिया |यह है सुशासन | (ङ)यह भी स्पष्ट हो जाता है की इनलोगों पर कोई अंकुश नहीं है ,ये लोग अपने आप में एक सरकार है ,क्योंकि हमारी तरफ से दसियों बार कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त महोदय को इनके इतने असाधारण विलम्ब की सारी कारगुजारियों से अवगत करवाया जा चूका था तथा कृषि मंत्री महोदय को भी मैं स्वयं मिल कर इन कारनामों के बारे में कहा था|यह बतला देना यहाँ आवश्यक है की कृषि मंत्री महोदय से जब हमलोग मिलने गए तो कृषि मंत्री श्री नरेन्द्र सिंह जी द्वारा यह कहा गया की “ये लोग(हमलोगों के बारे में) दो नंबर के आदमी हैं “ और विभाग ने कोई गलती नहीं की है |यह तो समय बताएगा की दो नंबर के लोग कौन हैं ,सिर्फ अपने NUISANCE VALUE के कारण कोई मंत्री पद प्राप्त कर लेता है तो वह आदमी स्वत एक नंबर का सदाचारी इंसान नहीं हो जाता , न ही ऐसे व्यक्ति को मंत्री पद प्राप्त होने के बाद यह कहने का हक मिल जाता है की वह किसी भी उद्यमी को दो नंबर का आदमी कहे |यह भी अत्यावश्यक है की अभी तक माननीय स्वर्गीय श्री अभय सिंह ,दिवंगत सदस्य ,बिहार विधान सभा ,के रहस्मयी मौत के बारे में अभी पर्दा उठाना बांकी है ,और सुशासन की पुरजोर कोशिश भी यही है की इस रहस्य को रहस्य बने रहने देना और जनता की स्मृति से जब यह बात विलुप्त हो जायेगी तब इस रहस्य को दफना देना है ,खास बात तो यह है की मंत्री महोदय के अपने चरित्र से ही नहीं अपनी सारी सांसारिक काया से दो नंबर की बू आती है और श्री अभय सिंह इन्ही के ज्येष्ठ पुत्र भी हैं|चना ,मसूर और खास कर ढैंचा बीज के खरीद में घोटाले का रहस्योदघाटन होना बांकी है |इन बीजों की खरीद में करोड़ों रूपैयों का घोटाला हुआ है जिसमे शीर्ष स्तर के राजनीतिग्य और पदाधिकारियों की संलिप्तता से इनकार नहीं किया जा सकता है | (च)कृषि निदेशालय के संजय सिंह के हैवानियत,निरंकुशता और बेशर्मियत का एक खास कारण यह भी है की कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त महोदय के पद पर जिन्होनें रह कर हमारी सुनवाई की थी उनका नाम श्री के. सी. साहा है जो मात्र १५ से २० दिनों के लिए कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त के रूप में इस कार्यभार को देख रहे थे |लेकिन श्री ए. के. सिन्हा जी के १५ से २० दिनों के अवकाश के बाद पुनः इन्होनें कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त का प्रभार ग्रहण कर लिया |यह भी यहाँ बतला देना आवश्यक है की श्री ए.के.सिन्हा जी ने हमारे अपील को दो महीने तक टाला और कम से कम इन दो महीनों में ४ बार सुनवाई की तारीख को adjournment for next date करते रहे|इन्होनेंस्वयं अवकाश पर जाने के पहले अंतिम तारीख २९.०९.२०१० दी थी लेकिन ये २३.०९.२०१० से ही अवकाश पर चले गए थे |चूँकि श्री के.सी. साहा साहब कृषि उत्पाफ्दन आयुक्त के पदभार से मुक्त हो गए, तब संजय सिंह को congenial atmosphere मिल गया अपनी हैवानियत को मूर्त रूप देने में|इस बारे में की congenial atmosphere कैसे और क्यों बन गया , मेरे से ज्यादा आप समझ सकते हैं ,मुझे बतलाने की आवश्यकता नहीं है | हमारे विरूद्ध यह चक्व्यूह की संरचना में संजय सिंह जो अत्यंत दम्भी व्यक्ति है का हाथ है और सब से ज्यादा हैरानी की बात तो यह है की कुछ भा.प्र.से. के पदाधिकारी अपने आप में जब अपने आप को एक सरकार मान लेते हैं तो उनके आचरण और कार्यशैली से आम जनता पर क्या प्रभाव पड़ेगा ,वो जान बुझ कर अनभिग्य बने रहते हैं ऐसे निरंकुश कारनामों से वही आम जन दर दर की ठोकर,कोर्ट से विभाग,विभाग से कोर्ट फिरता रहता है ,और इसी से जन्म लेता है माओवाद, नक्सलवाद , और फिर सुशासन के तहत इस आम जन को सुशासित करने के लिए सुशासन के बाबुओं को एक सुसज्जित सेना का सहारा लेना पड़ता है | वाह रे !आपका सुशासन नितीश बाबु | २०. हैवानियत और निरंकुशता के साथ साथ उच्च न्यायालय के आदेश की अवमाननना का डर की एक कहानी जिसका रचयिता यही संजय सिंह है वो भी सुन लीजिए | कृषि निदेशालय से निर्गत कृषि निदेशक ,बिहार ने बिहार एग्रो इंडस्टीज,फारविसगंज (यह प्रतिष्ठान भी विगत ३५ वर्षों से कार्यरत है और दानेदार मिश्रित उर्वरक का उत्पादन करता है )को एक पत्र लिखा जो इस प्रकार है :- प्रेषक , पत्र संख्या १३२१ /२२.११.२०१० अरविंदर सिंह ,भा.व्.से., कृषि निदेशक,बिहार | सेवामें , जिला कृषि पदाधिकारी , अररिया | विषय :- में. बिहार एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज,फारविसगंज के द्वारा पुनः उत्पादन कार्य शुरू किये जाने के सम्बन्ध में | महाशय , उपर्युक्त विषयक प्रसंग में कहना है की में.बिहार एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज ,फारविसगंज ने CWJC16645/10 में पारित न्यायादेश के आलोक में पुनः उत्पादन कार्य शुरू करने की सूचना दी है |न्यायादेश के आलोक में प्रयोगशाला सुविधा की जांच की प्रक्रिया की जा रही है |कृषि निदेशालय से तदोपरांत समुचित आदेश पारित किया जाएगा |कृषि निदेशक के द्वारा जब तक विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र का नवीकरण नहीं किया जाता है तब तक विनिर्माण कार प्रारम्भ करना उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड १८ का उल्लंघन है और गैरकानूनी है| आप अपने स्तर से जांच कर न्यायसंगत कार्रवाई करना सुनिश्चित करें | ह. अरविंदर सिंह दिनांक २२.११.२०१० (मो. न. ९४३१८१८७०४) २१. बिहार एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज ,फारविसगंज के मामले में जिला कृषि पदाधिकारी ,अररिया श्री बैद्यनाथ यादव ने दिनांक १०.१२.२०१० को पत्र संख्या १०३८ से परियोजना कार्यपालक पदाधिकारी अररिया को संबोधित करते हुए लिखा जो इस प्रकार है :- विषय :-मेसर्स बिहार एग्रो एजेंसीज ,फारविसगंज द्वारा कृषि निदेशक,बिहार,पटना के पत्र संख्या १३२१ दिनांक २२.११.२०१० में निहित निदेश का उल्लंघन कर पुनः उत्पादन कार्य प्रारंभ करने के सम्बन्ध में | प्रसंग:कृषि निदेशक, बिहार ,पटना का पत्र संख्या १३२१ दिनांक २२.११.२०१० | महाशय , उपर्युक्त विषय के सम्बन्ध में कहना है की इस कार्यालय के पत्र संख्या १००२ दिनांक ३०.११.२०१० द्वारा आपको उपरोक्त निर्माता कंपनी को जांच करने का निदेश दिया गया था | कृषि निदेशक,बिहार पटना के विषय अंकित पत्र जिसकी प्रति विनिर्माता इकाई को भी दी गयी है में निहित निदेश की उन्हें विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र का नवीकरण होने तक ,विनिर्माण कार्य पुनः आरम्भ नहीं करना है ,ऐसा करने से उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ का खंड (१८) का उल्लंघन होगा एवं गैरकानूनी भी है | कृषि निदेशक,बिहार पटना के इस निदेश के बाउजूद भी सम्बंधित विनिर्माता कंपनी के द्वारा उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश का उल्लंघन कर विनिर्माण कार्य किया जा रहा है | अतः आपको निदेश दिया जाता है की अविलम्ब निम्नांकित कार्रवाई करना सुनिश्चित करें:- (i)विनिर्माण इकाई में विनिर्माण कार्य में रोक लगा दें | (ii)विनिर्मित सामग्री एवं कच्चा माल का जब्ती सूची तैयार कर निर्मित सामग्री का नमूना संग्रह कर प्रयोगशाला में भेजें | (iii)कच्चा माल कहाँ से प्राप्त किया गया है उसका स्त्रोत्र प्राप्त कर साक्षय तैय
  3. .हाई कोर्ट के इस आदेश के विभाग में पहुँचने के बाद महज एक खानापूर्ति करने के लिए दिनांक २७.१२.२०१० को एक पत्र जिसका पत्रांक १४७० दिनांक २७.१२.२०१० कृषि निदेशालय से हमारे नाम से स्पष्टीकरण मांगने के लिए प्रेषित किया जाता है जो इस प्रकार है :-
    “उपर्युक्त विषयक कहना है की कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त के आदेश ज्ञापांक ४९६४ दिनांक ३०.०९.२०१० के आलोक में आपके प्रतिष्ठान के NPK मिश्रण विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र के नवीकरण की कार्रवाई प्रक्रियाधीन थी|इस बीच आपने अपने पत्र संख्या HAC –OUTLET CMD/10/235/01 दिनांक 22.11.2010 के द्वारा सूचित किया है की आपके द्वारा NPK मिश्रण का विनिर्माण कार्य प्रारम्भ कर दिया गया है |आप अवगत हैं की बिना विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र विनिर्माण कार्य करना उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड १२ का उल्लंघन है|आपके द्वारा बिना विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र प्राप्त किया ही विनिर्माण कार्य प्रारम्भ कर दिया गया है जो उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड १२ का उल्लंघन है और आपका कृत उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश के विरूद्ध है तथा गैर कानूनी है |

    अतः आप स्पष्ट करें की उपरोक्त आरोप के आलोक में क्यों नहीं आपके प्रतिष्ठान का विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र के नवीकरण हेतु आपसे प्राप्त आवेदन को उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश के खाद १८(२) के अंतर्गत अस्वीकृत कर दिया जाए |आप अपना स्पष्टीकरण दिनांक ०३.०१.२०११ तक अवश्य समर्पित करें अन्यथा एकतरफा निर्णय ले लिया जाएगा “ |
    (N.B. विभाग द्वारा स्वयं ही यह स्वीकार किया जा रहा है की हमारे मिश्रण विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र के “नवीकरण “की कार्रवाई प्रक्रियाधीन थी |तब हमपर क्या नवीकरण की धाराओं के उल्लंघन में आरोप लगाना उचित होगा या की नए अनुज्ञप्ति पंजीकरण की धाराओं के उल्लंघन का आरोप लगाना कहाँ तक उचित होता है |ऐसे भी यह एक गहन चिंता का विषय है की प्राथमिकी दर्ज करवाने के निमित्त पत्र में खंड १२ और ७ के उल्लंघन का उल्लेख है जबकि स्पष्टीकरण में खंड १८(२) के उल्लंघन का आरोप भी लगाया जा रहा है |
    एक सोची समझी हुई बदनीयती की तहत एक साजिश कर के प्राथमिकी के उपरान्त स्पष्टीकरण पूछने का एक ही तात्पर्य है की जिससे उच्च न्यायालय को पुख्ता जवाब दिया जा सके |ऐसे प्राथमिकी हो जाने के बाद ऐसे स्पष्टीकरण को कोई औचित्य ही नहीं रह जाता है |
    संजय सिंह की मंशा तो शुरू से ही थी की रु. १० लाख मिलने के बाद ही नवीकरण किया जाएगा |यह गैर कानूनी उगाही न होते देख इस व्यक्ति ने अपनी सारी ताकत झोंक कर और एक खास बेईमानी की नियत से न सिर्फ विभाग का समय बर्बाद करवाया है ,इसके साथ सैकड़ों मजदूरों को भी बेरोजगार कर दिया है ,लाखों रुपैये की खाद को पानी में परिवर्तित होकर बह जाने की खास कोशिश की है |हमारी बर्बादी करना तो इसके जेहन में २००७ से समा गयी थी जब यह व्यक्ति उल्टा सीधा आदेश डा. बी. राजेंद्र जी से करवाना शुरू कर दिया था |पर बिहार में भारतीय प्रशासनिक सेवा के ऐसे पदाधिकारी उल्टा सीधा आदेश देते ही रहते हैं जिससे इनका प्रभुत्व कायम रहे ,भले ही जनता का नुकसान होते रहे ,कम से कम कोर्ट कचहरी के चक्कर में समय तो बर्बाद ये पदाधिकारी करवा ही देते हैं और इसी में इनको दीखता है अपना बांकपन ,अपनी शक्ति |इन लोगों को यह भी शर्म नही है की कोर्ट के आदेश किस कदर इनके मुहं पर तमाचा लगाते है |कोर्ट ने इनके और एक खास कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त के ऐसे ही आदेश के विरूद्ध एक अन्य मामले में जो हमारे मामले से हूबहू मिलता जुलता है में टिप्पणी की थी वो इस प्रकार है :- CWJC 16645 of 2010 order dated 1.10.2010 – “It is evident from the impugned order that they suffer from non-application of mind to the requirements of the Fertilizer Control Order not only with respect to the facts of the case but also the requirement of law .
    “Once the petitioner had taken the stand that shortage of equipments in the laboratory was rectified,either the respondent authorities ought have accepted the same or they could have made inspection of the Laboratory to verify the statements made and thereafter appropriate orders should have been passed keeping in view the valuable rights of the petitioner involved in the matter .
    “On consideration of the entire facts and circumstances the order dated 4.06.2010 of the Director,Agriculture and 13.09.2010 of the Agriculture Production Commissioner are set aside and the matter is remanded to the Director ,Agriculture to consider the question of renewal of the registration certificate of the petitioner in accordance with law after considering the documents submitted by the petitioner and,if necessary by getting the inspection of the petitioner’s laboratory done by a team of competent Officers .

    “Let the application for renewal of the petioner be considered and disposed of within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt /production of a copy of this order.

    The writ petition is disposed of with the afore said observations and directions .”

    Sd/- Ramesh Kumar Dutta ,J.
    लेकिन शर्म तो इन प्रशासनिक पदाधिकारियों ने एक दानवी हैवान के पहलू में गिरवी रख दी है |इसका एक खास कारण यह भी है की ऐसे पदाधिकारिओं का मान बढ़ता है चोर और सिरफिरे राजनीतिज्ञों का प्रश्रय मिलने पर |और कम से कम आज के कृषि विभाग में ऐसा ही हो रहा है |

    १९.दिनांक २०.१२.२०१० के उच्च न्यायालय के आदेश के आलोक में उच्च न्यायालय के निर्देशानुसार हमारे अनुज्ञप्ति नवीकरण को नहीं करके कृषि निदेशक ने आदेश संख्या २५ दिनांक ७.०१.२०११ को हमारे आवेदन को पुनः अस्वीकृत कर दिया वह भी जब उच्च न्यायालय ने स्पष्ट कर दिया था की “matter for renewal of certificate of Registration for manufacture and sale of Mixture of fertilizers is pending before the Director,Agriculture ,Government of Bihar since 30.09.2010 when order passed by Agriculture Production Commissioner,Bihar in appeal no. 7 of 2010 was communicated “.

    कृषि निदेशक ने इस मद में एक आदेश निकाला जो दिनांक ६.०१.२०११ को दस्तखत किया गया और वह इस प्रकार है :-
    प्वाइंट नो. ६ .”प्रतिष्ठान से प्राप्त स्पस्टीकरण संतोषप्रद एवं स्वीकार्य नहीं है |प्रतिष्ठान की ओर से प्राप्त स्पस्टीकरण से स्पस्ट होता है की उनके द्वारा उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड १८(४)एवं ११(४)के अंतर्गत प्रतिष्ठान के विनिर्माण एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र को वैध माना गया है |इस सम्बन्ध में उक्त दोनों खण्डों का उल्लेख करना समीचीन प्रतीत होता है |खंड १८(४) निम्नवत है :-
    “where the application for renewal is made within the time specified in sub-clause (1)or sub-clause (3),the applicant shall be deemed to have held a valid certificate of manufacture until such date as the registering authority passes order on application for renewal “
    तथा ११(४) निम्नवत है :-
    “where the application for renewal of certificate of registration is made within the time specified in sub-clause (1)or sub-clause (3),the applicant shall be deemed to have held a valid certificate of registration until such date as the controller passes order on application for renewal”

    उपरोक्त दोनों खण्डों के अवलोकन से स्पष्ट है की नवीकरण हेतु लंबित विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र उस अवधि तक वैध है जब तक की पंजीकरण पदाधिकारी के द्वारा आदेश पारित नहीं कर दिया जाय |में. हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स प्रा. ली. के मामले में प्रतिष्ठान का नवीकरण हेतु प्राप्त आवेदन अद्योहसताक्षरी के आदेश दिनांक २३.०७.१० के द्वारा अस्वीकृत किया जा चूका है |अतः उर्वरक नियत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड १८(४) एवं ११(४) के अनुसार दिनांक २३.०७.२०१० को प्रतिष्ठान के विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र की वैधता समाप्त हो चुकी है |
    प्वाइंट न..७ :-कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त के द्वारा अपील -७/२०१० में पारित आदेश में कृषि निदेशक को निदेश दिया गया था की अपीलकर्ता के प्रयोगशाला में सभी न्यूनतम उपकरणों की जांच कर संतुष्ट होने पर अपीलकर्ता के विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र को नवीकृत करेंगे एवं इसे निर्गत करते समत विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र को नवीकृत करने पर विचार करेंगे |अपिलवाद के दिए गये आदेश के आलोक में प्रयोगशाला की सुविधा की जांच कर अग्रेतर कार्रवाही की जा रही थी |परन्तु इसी बीच में हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स प्रा. ली. के द्वारा अनाधिकृत रूप से विनिर्माण एवं विपणन कार्य प्रारम्भ कर दिया गया जबकि अध्योहस्ताक्षरी के द्वारा कृषि निदेशालय के ज्ञापांक ८९८ दिनांक २३.०७.२०१० को संशोधन करने सम्बन्धी कोई भी आदेश निर्गत नहीं किया गया |इस परिस्थति में में. हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स प्रा.ली. के द्वारा किया गया विनिर्माण एवं विपणन कार्य बिना विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र प्राप्त किये किया गया है जो उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ क्र खंड १२ एवं ७ का उल्लंघन है एवं जिसके लिए प्रतिष्ठान के विरूद्ध के. हाट थाना, पूर्णिया एवं फारविसगंज थाना ,अररिया में प्राथमिकी दर्ज की जा चुकी है |

    प्वाइंट न. ८ :-उपरोक्त तथ्यों से स्पष्ट है की में. हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स प्रा. ली. के द्वारा विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र के बिना उर्वरक मिश्रण का विनिर्माण एवं विपणन कार्य कर उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड १२ एवं ७ का उल्लंघन किया गया है |प्रतिष्ठान के द्वारा उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश के उपरोक्त खंड को उल्लंघन करने के आरोप में दिनांक ३०.०९.२०१० को में. हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स प्रा. ली. के द्वारा समर्पित विनिर्माण एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र के नवीकरण हेतु आवेदन को अस्वीकृत किया जाता है |”

    N.B. कृषि निदेशक के इस आदेश से निम्न बातें साफ़-साफ़ स्पष्ट हो जाती हैं:-
    (क)हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स के इस मामले में उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के तहत खंड १२ एवं खंड ७ ही लागू होगा न की खंड १८(४) एवं ११(४)
    (ख)कृषि निदेशालय के उपर्वर्नित पत्राचार से यह भी साफ़ हो जाता है की यह मामला नवीकरण का न होकर नए अनुज्ञप्ति पंजीकरण का ही होगा | जबकि यह भी सत्य है की यह फेक्ट्री विगत ३० वर्षों से कार्यरत है और १० बार इसकी अनुज्ञप्तियों का नवीकरण हो चूका है |इसका मतलब सीधा है की कृषि निदेशालय के अनुसार इन अनुज्ञप्तियों का स्वतः deregistration हो चुका है |भविष्य में हमारा पंजीकरण नए रूप में हो भी सकता है और नहीं भी हो सकता है |होगा तभी जब इन लोगों को हम विधाता माने और इनकी पूजा अर्चना करें|
    (ग) यह भी साफ़ हो जाता है की कृषि निदेशालय में कृषि निदेशक श्री अरविंदर सिंह और संजय सिंह के मन में जो आएगा वो ये करेंगे और न उच्च न्यायालय का कोई आदेश इन लोगों पर लागू होता और न ही कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त का, क्योंकि कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त महोदय के आदेश के बाद हमारी प्रयोगशाला में निर्धारित उपकरणों की व्यवस्था कर ली गयी है जिसकी सूचना हमलोगों ने ३०.०९.२०१० को ही दे दी थी,इनलोगों ने इस आदेश के ५३ वे दिन बाद ही हमारे प्रयोगशाला को जांच करवाया |
    (घ)इतना ही नहीं प्रयोगशाला के जांचोपरांत दिनांक २३.११,२०१० को जोविभाग द्वारा सम्भव हो पाया ,इस जांच प्रतिवेदन में साफ़ –साफ़ यह प्रतिवेदित है की उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ की धारा २१(ए) का प्रतिष्ठान द्वारा पूर्णरूपेण पालन कर लिया गया है ,के बाद भी २३ दिन बीत जाने के बाद याने १८.१२.२०१० तक भी नवीकरण करने की कोई प्रक्रिया सिर्फ विचाराधीन थी या यह कहा जाए की हमलोगों पर प्राथमिकी दर्ज और संयंत्र को सील करवाने की प्रक्रिया करने की जुगत में इन २३ दिनों में ये दोनों महानुभाव लगे हुए थे और अंततःइनलोगों ने एक हैवानियत का उदहारण देते हुए हमलोगों पर प्राथमिकी और संयंत्र को सील करवाने की प्रक्रिया को अंजाम दे ही दिया |यह है सुशासन |
    (ङ)यह भी स्पष्ट हो जाता है की इनलोगों पर कोई अंकुश नहीं है ,ये लोग अपने आप में एक सरकार है ,क्योंकि हमारी तरफ से दसियों बार कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त महोदय को इनके इतने असाधारण विलम्ब की सारी कारगुजारियों से अवगत करवाया जा चूका था तथा कृषि मंत्री महोदय को भी मैं स्वयं मिल कर इन कारनामों के बारे में कहा था|यह बतला देना यहाँ आवश्यक है की कृषि मंत्री महोदय से जब हमलोग मिलने गए तो कृषि मंत्री श्री नरेन्द्र सिंह जी द्वारा यह कहा गया की “ये लोग(हमलोगों के बारे में) दो नंबर के आदमी हैं “ और विभाग ने कोई गलती नहीं की है |यह तो समय बताएगा की दो नंबर के लोग कौन हैं ,सिर्फ अपने NUISANCE VALUE के कारण कोई मंत्री पद प्राप्त कर लेता है तो वह आदमी स्वत एक नंबर का सदाचारी इंसान नहीं हो जाता , न ही ऐसे व्यक्ति को मंत्री पद प्राप्त होने के बाद यह कहने का हक मिल जाता है की वह किसी भी उद्यमी को दो नंबर का आदमी कहे |यह भी अत्यावश्यक है की अभी तक माननीय स्वर्गीय श्री अभय सिंह ,दिवंगत सदस्य ,बिहार विधान सभा ,के रहस्मयी मौत के बारे में अभी पर्दा उठाना बांकी है ,और सुशासन की पुरजोर कोशिश भी यही है की इस रहस्य को रहस्य बने रहने देना और जनता की स्मृति से जब यह बात विलुप्त हो जायेगी तब इस रहस्य को दफना देना है ,खास बात तो यह है की मंत्री महोदय के अपने चरित्र से ही नहीं अपनी सारी सांसारिक काया से दो नंबर की बू आती है और श्री अभय सिंह इन्ही के ज्येष्ठ पुत्र भी हैं|चना ,मसूर और खास कर ढैंचा बीज के खरीद में घोटाले का रहस्योदघाटन होना बांकी है |इन बीजों की खरीद में करोड़ों रूपैयों का घोटाला हुआ है जिसमे शीर्ष स्तर के राजनीतिग्य और पदाधिकारियों की संलिप्तता से इनकार नहीं किया जा सकता है |
    (च)कृषि निदेशालय के संजय सिंह के हैवानियत,निरंकुशता और बेशर्मियत का एक खास कारण यह भी है की कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त महोदय के पद पर जिन्होनें रह कर हमारी सुनवाई की थी उनका नाम श्री के. सी. साहा है जो मात्र १५ से २० दिनों के लिए कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त के रूप में इस कार्यभार को देख रहे थे |लेकिन श्री ए. के. सिन्हा जी के १५ से २० दिनों के अवकाश के बाद पुनः इन्होनें कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त का प्रभार ग्रहण कर लिया |यह भी यहाँ बतला देना आवश्यक है की श्री ए.के.सिन्हा जी ने हमारे अपील को दो महीने तक टाला और कम से कम इन दो महीनों में ४ बार सुनवाई की तारीख को adjournment for next date करते रहे|इन्होनेंस्वयं अवकाश पर जाने के पहले अंतिम तारीख २९.०९.२०१० दी थी लेकिन ये २३.०९.२०१० से ही अवकाश पर चले गए थे |चूँकि श्री के.सी. साहा साहब कृषि उत्पाफ्दन आयुक्त के पदभार से मुक्त हो गए, तब संजय सिंह को congenial atmosphere मिल गया अपनी हैवानियत को मूर्त रूप देने में|इस बारे में की congenial atmosphere कैसे और क्यों बन गया , मेरे से ज्यादा आप समझ सकते हैं ,मुझे बतलाने की आवश्यकता नहीं है |
    हमारे विरूद्ध यह चक्व्यूह की संरचना में संजय सिंह जो अत्यंत दम्भी व्यक्ति है का हाथ है और सब से ज्यादा हैरानी की बात तो यह है की कुछ भा.प्र.से. के पदाधिकारी अपने आप में जब अपने आप को एक सरकार मान लेते हैं तो उनके आचरण और कार्यशैली से आम जनता पर क्या प्रभाव पड़ेगा ,वो जान बुझ कर अनभिग्य बने रहते हैं ऐसे निरंकुश कारनामों से वही आम जन दर दर की ठोकर,कोर्ट से विभाग,विभाग से कोर्ट फिरता रहता है ,और इसी से जन्म लेता है माओवाद, नक्सलवाद , और फिर सुशासन के तहत इस आम जन को सुशासित करने के लिए सुशासन के बाबुओं को एक सुसज्जित सेना का सहारा लेना पड़ता है | वाह रे !आपका सुशासन नितीश बाबु |
    २०. हैवानियत और निरंकुशता के साथ साथ उच्च न्यायालय के आदेश की अवमाननना का डर की एक कहानी जिसका रचयिता यही संजय सिंह है वो भी सुन लीजिए | कृषि निदेशालय से निर्गत कृषि निदेशक ,बिहार ने बिहार एग्रो इंडस्टीज,फारविसगंज (यह प्रतिष्ठान भी विगत ३५ वर्षों से कार्यरत है और दानेदार मिश्रित उर्वरक का उत्पादन करता है )को एक पत्र लिखा जो इस प्रकार है :-

    प्रेषक , पत्र संख्या १३२१ /२२.११.२०१०
    अरविंदर सिंह ,भा.व्.से.,
    कृषि निदेशक,बिहार |
    सेवामें ,
    जिला कृषि पदाधिकारी ,
    अररिया |

    विषय :- में. बिहार एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज,फारविसगंज के द्वारा पुनः उत्पादन कार्य शुरू किये जाने के सम्बन्ध में |

    महाशय ,
    उपर्युक्त विषयक प्रसंग में कहना है की में.बिहार एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज ,फारविसगंज ने CWJC16645/10 में पारित न्यायादेश के आलोक में पुनः उत्पादन कार्य शुरू करने की सूचना दी है |न्यायादेश के आलोक में प्रयोगशाला सुविधा की जांच की प्रक्रिया की जा रही है |कृषि निदेशालय से तदोपरांत समुचित आदेश पारित किया जाएगा |कृषि निदेशक के द्वारा जब तक विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र का नवीकरण नहीं किया जाता है तब तक विनिर्माण कार प्रारम्भ करना उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड १८ का उल्लंघन है और गैरकानूनी है|
    आप अपने स्तर से जांच कर न्यायसंगत कार्रवाई करना सुनिश्चित करें |
    ह. अरविंदर सिंह दिनांक २२.११.२०१० (मो. न. ९४३१८१८७०४)

    २१. बिहार एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज ,फारविसगंज के मामले में जिला कृषि पदाधिकारी ,अररिया श्री बैद्यनाथ यादव ने दिनांक १०.१२.२०१० को पत्र संख्या १०३८ से परियोजना कार्यपालक पदाधिकारी अररिया को संबोधित करते हुए लिखा जो इस प्रकार है :-

    विषय :-मेसर्स बिहार एग्रो एजेंसीज ,फारविसगंज द्वारा कृषि निदेशक,बिहार,पटना के पत्र संख्या १३२१ दिनांक २२.११.२०१० में निहित निदेश का उल्लंघन कर पुनः उत्पादन कार्य प्रारंभ करने के सम्बन्ध में |
    प्रसंग:कृषि निदेशक, बिहार ,पटना का पत्र संख्या १३२१ दिनांक २२.११.२०१० |

    महाशय ,
    उपर्युक्त विषय के सम्बन्ध में कहना है की इस कार्यालय के पत्र संख्या १००२ दिनांक ३०.११.२०१० द्वारा आपको उपरोक्त निर्माता कंपनी को जांच करने का निदेश दिया गया था |
    कृषि निदेशक,बिहार पटना के विषय अंकित पत्र जिसकी प्रति विनिर्माता इकाई को भी दी गयी है में निहित निदेश की उन्हें विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र का नवीकरण होने तक ,विनिर्माण कार्य पुनः आरम्भ नहीं करना है ,ऐसा करने से उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ का खंड (१८) का उल्लंघन होगा एवं गैरकानूनी भी है |
    कृषि निदेशक,बिहार पटना के इस निदेश के बाउजूद भी सम्बंधित विनिर्माता कंपनी के द्वारा उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश का उल्लंघन कर विनिर्माण कार्य किया जा रहा है |
    अतः आपको निदेश दिया जाता है की अविलम्ब निम्नांकित कार्रवाई करना सुनिश्चित करें:-
    (i)विनिर्माण इकाई में विनिर्माण कार्य में रोक लगा दें |
    (ii)विनिर्मित सामग्री एवं कच्चा माल का जब्ती सूची तैयार कर निर्मित सामग्री का नमूना संग्रह कर प्रयोगशाला में भेजें |
    (iii)कच्चा माल कहाँ से प्राप्त किया गया है उसका स्त्रोत्र प्राप्त कर साक्षय तैयार कर कार्रवाई करें |
    (iv)कृषि निदेशक ,बिहार,पटना के प्रासंगिक पत्र के आलोक में अवैध निर्माण कार्य करने के कारण उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १८९५ खंड (१८) का उल्लंघन करने के आरोप में स्थानीय थाना में प्राथमिकी दर्ज करें |आवश्यकतानुसार स्थानीय थाना एवं अनुमंडल पदाधिकारी फारविसगंज का सहयोग प्राप्त कर कृत कार्रवाई से अध्योहस्ताक्षरी एवं कृषि निदेशक ,बिहार,पटना को भी अवगत करें |
    ह. बैद्यनाथ यादव ,जिला कृषि पदाधिकारी |

    २२. इसके उपरांत दिनांक १२.१२.२०१० को पत्रांक संख्या १५३ से परियोजना कार्यपालक पदाधिकारी ,फारविसगंज श्री मक्केश्वर पासवान ने स्थानीय थाना फारविसगंज में बिहार एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज पर प्राथमिकी दर्ज कराते हुए इस फेक्ट्री को भी सील कर दिया |
    २३.अचानक तारीख २३.१२. २०१० को इस फेक्ट्री मालिक श्री अभय दूगड को भी स्पष्टीकरण पूछा जाता है जिसमे कृषि निदेशक कार्यालय का पत्रांक १४६० अंकित है वो इस प्रकार है:-
    “प्वाइंट न. २ उपरोक्त से स्पष्ट है की आपके द्वारा उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश १९८५ के खंड १२ का उल्लंघन करते हुए विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र के नवीकरण के बिना विनिर्माण कार्य किया जा रहा है जो गैरकानूनी है |उल्लेखनीय है की इस क्रम में आपके विरूद्ध फारविसगंज थाना में वाद सं.४८९/१० दिनांक १२.१२.२०१० भी दर्ज किया गया है |
    प्वाइंट न.२ आप स्पष्ट करें की उपरोक्त आरोप के आलोक में क्यों नहीं आपके प्रतिष्ठान का विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र के नवीकरण हेतु प्राप्त आवेदन को उर्वरक नियंत्रण आदेश के खंड १८ (२) के अंतर्गत अस्वीकृत कर दिया जाए |आप अपना स्पष्टीकरण दिनांक २८.१२.२०१० तक अवश्य समर्पित करें अन्यथा एकतरफा निर्णय ले लिया जाएगा |”

    २४. फिर अचानक ६.०१.२०११ को कृषि निदेशक ,कार्यालय से एक आदेश निकलता है जिसकी आदेश संख्या २० दिनांक ६.०१.२०११ है वो इस प्रकार है :-
    प्वाइंट न. २ :-“ माननिय उच्च न्यायलय ,पटना के आदेश के आलोक में में. बिहार एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज के प्रयोगशाला का जांच प्रतिवेदन एवं उपलब्ध अभिलेखों के आलोक में में. बिहार एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज का विनिर्माण प्रमाण पत्र एवं विपणन प्राधिकार पत्र का नवीकरण करने का निर्णय लिया जाता है एवं बिहार एगो इंडस्ट्रीज को सील मुक्त किया जाता है |”
    कृषि निदेशक ,बिहार,पटना द्वारा इस तरह से हुबहू एक ही तरह के आरोप में एक फेक्ट्री को सील मुक्त एवं उनकी अनुज्ञप्तियों को नवीकरण करने का निर्णय ले लिया जाता है और
    इसी तारीख को हमारी फेक्ट्री के अनुज्ञप्तियों के नवीकरण की प्रक्रिया को स्थगित कर दी जाती है और नवीकरण अस्वीकृत कर दिया जाता है जिसके बारे में निर्गत आदेश संख्या २५ दिनांक ७.०१.२०११ का वर्णन हमारे इस प्रतिवेदन के प्वाइंट न. १९ पर वर्णित है |

    कितना अभूतपूर्व उदहारण पेश किया गया है सुशासन का |

    २५.इसी संजय सिंह की हैवानियत का वर्णन आपने सुन ही लिया |अब देखिये की यही शख्स दिनांक ११.१.२०११ को उच्च न्यायालय से माफ़ी मांगता है जिसका वर्णन इसने अपने ही अपने शपथ-पत्र द्वारा इस प्रकार किया है :-

    Most Respectfully sheweth :-

    1.That the deponent offer unconditional and unqualified apology for any inconvenience caused to the Hon’ble High Court in the due administration of Justice.
    2.That the deponent has a great respect for law as well as the Hon’ble courtand he cannot think to go against the slightest observation made by the Hon’ble Court .
    3.That the deponent is duty bound to comply each and every words of Hon’ble High Court in the same spirit in accordance with law .
    4.That at the outset it is informed that the certificate of manufacture and letter of authorisation of M/S Bihar Agro Industries have been renewed on 7.01.2011 .An unqualified and unconditional apology is being tendered for the procedural delay in comply with the matter —-A photo copy of renewed certificate of manufacture and letter of authorisation is annexed herewith and marked as annexure 1 series to this show-cause
    And thus are point 5 ,6,7,8 and 9 .
    अब आप समझ सकते हैं आपके विभागों के पदाधिकारियों की हैवानियत की करतूतें और कोर्ट के डर से इनके भींगी बिल्ली बन जाने का तरीका.
    जो भी हो इस व्यक्ति संजय सिंह ने ८ महीने तक इस फेक्ट्री और हमारी फेक्ट्री को १० महीने तक घोर अपराधिक षड्यंत्र कर के बंद करवा दिया |सहज अनुमान लगाया जा सकता है की हमलोगों का जो नुकसान हुआ वो तो हुआ ही ,पर हमारी प्रतिष्ठा पर भी इस हैवान द्वारा कुठाराघात किया गया |आज तक सैकडो मजदूर बेरोजगार बैठे हुए हैं |लाखों की खाद पानी होकर बह चुकी है |३५ नियमित कामगार भाग चुके हैं |लाखों रुपैया जो राजस्व के रूप में राज्य सरकार और केंद्रीय सरकार को दिया जाता था ,ऐसी सभी व्यवस्था छिन्न-भिन्न हो गयी है |बैंकों के कर्ज पर व्याज अनावश्यक बढ़ रहा है | लाखों की प्लांट और मशीनरी जंग खा रही है और बेकाम हो गयी है |

    कैसा सुन्दर उदहारण है सुशासन का यह अनुमान लगाया जा सकता है |

    २६. इसी संजय सिंह ने ७ लाख ३० हज़ार रुपैया बिहार एगो इंडस्ट्रीज से लेकर इनके कारखाने को इतनी प्रताडना देने के बाद भी आखिर लिया और तभी चालु या अनुज्ञप्ति नवीकरण का आदेश कृषि निदेशक से दिलवाया |हमलोगों से इसकी मंशा १० लाख रुपैया लेने की थी |इस व्यक्ति ने तारीख २६.११.२०१० से लेकर १३.१२.२०१० तक बार बार तरह तरह के लोगों से हमेशा हमारे ऊपर दबाव बनाया की १० लाख रुपैया इनको दे दें नहीं तो अनुज्ञप्तियों को कभी भी नवीकृत नहीं किया जाएगा और यह भी धमकी दिलवाते रहा की समय रहते पैसा नहीं मिलेगा तो आगे क्या क्या होगा उसका हमलोगों को भुक्तभोगी होना पड़ेगा |
    इसकी इस नाजायज़ पैसे की मंशा पूरी नहीं होते देख इस हैवान ने गैरकानूनी तरीके से आखिरकार हमारी फेक्ट्री को १८.१२.२०१० को सील करवा दिया और प्राथमिकी दर्ज करवा ही दी |

    २७.यहीं पर फिर सिलसिला खत्म नहीं होता है |हमलोगों ने इस अन्याय के खिलाफ फिर उच्च न्यायालय में एक I.A. याचिका दी और इस याचिका की सुनवाई २७.०१.२०११ को हुई और आदेश जो निकला वो इस प्रकार है:-
    Point no.11- From the facts and circumstances of this case as well as order of the authorities (annexure 3 &4),it is quite apprent that the authorities as well as the petitioner had taken steps as per clause 32 and 32 A according to which the appeal was filed by the petitioner himself which was entertained by the appellate authority .The impugned order is in continuation of the said battle and hence,the corse of appeal being available to the petitioner ,there is no occasion for this court to entertain this writ petition .Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order of the Director (Agriculture)before the Agriculture Production Commissioner under the aforesaid provisions raising all the points that he raised here and the said appellate authority will decide the same in accordance with law considering the provisions of law as well as the decision of this court in similar matters .If the petitioner files an appeal within 15 days from today ,the appellate authority shall decide the same expeditiously preferably within aperiod of 6 weeks from the date of filing of the appeal …sd/- (S.N. Hussain ,J)

    २८.हमलोगों ने फिर कृषि उत्पादन आयुक्त महोदय के यहाँ अपील कर दी |लेकिन एक बड़ा ही रोमांचकारी तथ्य सामने आया |५ सप्ताह बीत जाने के बाद इसी संजय ने फाइल पर एक नोटिंग बना कर यह लिखा की २००३ में ही एक कृषि विभाग का प्रशासनिक आदेश निकला हुआ है जिसमे निदेशक कृषि के आदेश के खिलाफ अपील सचिव (कृषि ) को ही सुनना है |इसलिए सचिव (कृषि ) ही इस मामले को सुने |सचिव(कृषि) ने भी इसकी सुनवाई हेतु इसी फाइल में अपनी हामी भर दी |और १२.३.२०११ को हमारी सुनवाई हो गयी जिसका आदेश २१.३.२०११ को प्राप्त हुआ जो स्वयं एक सुशासन का अपने आप में एक नमूना है ,वो इस प्रकार है :-

    Point no. 4 . 11 . It would not be out of place to state that the petitioner contends that this case was similar to that of Bihar Agro Industries ,Forbesganj ,whose licence has been renewed on 6 th January 2011.
    Point no.5.1 The respondents basic contention is that the appellant in wilful disobedience of the Order of the Agriculture Production Commissioner dated 30.09.2010(as written in the order it is 30.09.2011)wherein mandatory laboratory equipments were to be obtained and inspection conducted to the satisfaction of the licensing authority.The appellant thus violated the basic condition of licensing as laid down under clause 7 &12 of the Fertilizer Control order 1985 .
    Point no. 5.2.The respondents aslo state that the laboratory equipments available was insufficient thus the appellant failed to fulfill the NECESSARY AND MANDATORY ORDER OF THE AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION COMMISSIONER .

    On careful consideration of the argument of both the sides it is apprent that the bone of contention is whether the petitioner was lawful in initiating production without waiting for renewal of licence vide clause 18(4)and 11(4)or the licensing authority is competent in enforcing clause 7 and 12 of the fertilizer control order 1985 .
    In my view of the matter on a reading the bare control order I find the petitioner seriously deficient in not waiting for a renewal order to be passed by the licensing authority where he had waited since March 2010 another month or so wouldn’t have made any difference.Further more the order of the Appellate Authority was not absolute rather conditional which presupposed the satisfaction of the Licensing authority before start of production .The petitioner clearly failed to interpret the order in the spirit it was delivered rather he became impatient and controverted the order thereby contravening the provisions of clause 7 & 12 of the fertilizer control order 1985 .
    Hence in the light of the above ,I, appellate authority (vide notification dated 18.8.2003 )hereby dismiss the appeal and uphold the order of the learned licensing authority passed on 7.01.2011. sd/- C.K. Anil

    अब आप देख सकते हैं की बिहार एग्रो इंडस्ट्रीज और हमारा matter एक ही हैं यह हमने अपनी अपील में सारे कागजातों के साथ लिख कर दिया |सारे ३ पन्नों के इस आदेश में कहीं भी इस बात का जिक्र नहीं है की हमलोगों का कथन की दोनों फेक्ट्रियों का मामला एक ही जैसा है ,यह कथन सही है या नहीं |
    शायद जिक्र इसलिए नहीं है क्योंकि मामला एक ही जैसा है और एक को लाइसेंस दिया जाता है और दुसरे को और फंसाया जाता है चूँकि इस सच्चाई के विरूद्ध विभाग पूर्णतया नंगा है |

    प्वाइंट नो.५. १. |बात समझ के बाहर है क्योंकि त्रिसदस्सीय पदाधिकारियों के दल द्वारा प्रयोगशाला की जांच बहुत पहले २३.११.२०१० को ही कर ली गयी थी और इस जांच दल का जांच प्रतिवेदन बड़ा स्पष्ट है जो ऊपर mention किया हुआ है |
    शायद मांगे गयी राशि (दस लाख रुपैया )नहीं दिया गया था इसलिए यह बात सामने आई की inspection was not conducted according to the satisfaction of the licensing authority.

    प्रयोगशाला में धारा २१ (ए) में निहित उपकरणों का type और कितनी मात्र में ये उपकरण रखे जाने है , इसके अलावा और कोई शर्त अलावा इसके की १० लाख रुपैये की मांग संजय सिंह द्वारा की गयी थी ,और कोई कानूनी प्रावधान हमल्गों के समझ के बाहर है |

    सचिव (कृषि ) द्वारा यह लिखा जाना की “if the petitioner would have waited for one month or so when he had waited since March 2010 wouldn’t have made any difference “ क्या इस बात से यह नहीं लगता है की इस मामले में कुछ भी आरोप जो विभाग ने लगा कर हमारे साथ एक क्रूर खेल खेला है ,वो कोई आरोप ही नहीं है ,सिर्फ हमलोगों को जरूरत थी की इन विधाताओं को खुश रखने की, एक महीना और बिना फेक्ट्री चलाये हमलोग रहते तो ये विधाताओं का मान बना रहता या हमलोग भी बिहार एग्रो की तरह तंग आकार इनकी जेबों को भर देते याने १० लाख रुपैया दे देते तो सब कुछ ठीक था ,तब यही कानून बदल जाता |

    आज के दिन भी हमारा उत्पादन बंद है |सैंकडो मजदूर बेरोजगार हो गए हैं ,बैंकों का लाखों रुपियों का व्याज देना पड़ रहा है और करीब १५ लाख रुपियों की खाद पानी होकर बह चुकीं है |इस संजय जनित क्रूरता के कारण मेरे पिता मानसिक रूप से अस्वस्थ हो गए हैं जो ८० वर्ष के हैं |

    अगर हो सके तो पुरे मामले की जांच करवा ली जाए और न्याय दिलवाने की व्यवस्था की जाए.

    आपका
    शम्भू गोयल
    मेनेजिंग डाइरेक्टर,
    हिमालय एग्रो केमिकल्स प्रा. ली.
    फारविसगंज (अररिया )

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: